Bayer CropScience, 2 T.W. Alexander Dr., Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Chemosphere. 2013 Jan;90(2):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
Vegetative filter strips (VFS) are proposed for protection of receiving water bodies and aquatic organisms from pesticides in runoff, but there is debate regarding the efficiency and filter size requirements. This debate is largely due to the belief that no quantitative methodology exists for predicting runoff buffer efficiency when conducting acute and/or chronic environmental exposure assessments. Previous research has proposed a modeling approach that links the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) PRZM/EXAMS with a well-tested process-based model for VFS (VFSMOD). In this research, we apply the modeling framework to determine (1) the most important input factors for quantifying mass reductions of pesticides by VFS in aquatic exposure assessments relative to three distinct U.S. EPA scenarios encompassing a wide range of conditions; (2) the expected range in percent reductions in acute and chronic estimated environmental concentrations (EECs); and (3) the differential influence of VFS when conducting acute versus chronic exposure assessments. This research utilized three, 30-yr U.S. EPA scenarios: Illinois corn, California tomato, and Oregon wheat. A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) method identified the most important input factors based on discrete uniform probability distributions for five input factors: VFS length (VL), organic-carbon sorption coefficient (K(oc)), half-lives in both water and soil phases, and application timing. For percent reductions in acute and chronic EECs, VL and application timing were consistently the most important input factors independent of EPA scenario. The potential ranges in acute and chronic EECs varied as a function of EPA scenario and application timing. Reductions in acute EECs were typically less than percent reductions in chronic EECs because acute exposure was driven primarily by large individual rainfall and runon events. Importantly, generic specification of VFS design characteristics equal across scenarios should be avoided. The revised pesticide assessment modeling framework offers the ability to elucidate the complex and non-linear relationships that can inform targeted VFS design specifications.
植被过滤带 (VFS) 被提议用于保护受纳水体和水生生物免受径流中农药的影响,但对于其效率和过滤尺寸要求存在争议。这种争议主要源于这样一种观点,即在进行急性和/或慢性环境暴露评估时,不存在预测径流缓冲效率的定量方法。先前的研究提出了一种建模方法,将美国环保署 (EPA) 的 PRZM/EXAMS 与经过充分测试的 VFS(VFSMOD)过程基础模型联系起来。在这项研究中,我们应用建模框架来确定:(1) 在与涵盖广泛条件的三个不同美国 EPA 情景相关的水生暴露评估中,量化 VFS 减少农药质量的最重要输入因素;(2) 急性和慢性估计环境浓度 (EEC) 减少的预期范围;以及 (3) 在进行急性与慢性暴露评估时,VFS 的差异影响。本研究利用了三个 30 年的美国 EPA 情景:伊利诺伊州玉米、加利福尼亚州番茄和俄勒冈州小麦。全局敏感性分析 (GSA) 方法基于五个输入因素的离散均匀概率分布,确定了最重要的输入因素:VFS 长度 (VL)、有机碳吸附系数 (K(oc))、水相和土壤相的半衰期,以及施药时间。对于急性和慢性 EEC 的减少百分比,VL 和施药时间始终是独立于 EPA 情景的最重要输入因素。急性和慢性 EEC 的潜在范围随 EPA 情景和施药时间而变化。急性 EEC 的减少通常小于慢性 EEC 的减少百分比,因为急性暴露主要受大的单次降雨和径流事件驱动。重要的是,应避免在各个情景中通用指定 VFS 设计特征。经修订的农药评估建模框架提供了阐明复杂和非线性关系的能力,这些关系可以为有针对性的 VFS 设计规范提供信息。