Suppr超能文献

长期环境暴露评估中用于植被过滤带农药去除的经验和机理方程的比较。

Comparison of empirical and mechanistic equations for vegetative filter strip pesticide mitigation in long-term environmental exposure assessments.

机构信息

Hydrology & Water Quality, Agricultural & Biological Engineering, University of Florida, 287 Frazier Rogers Hall, P.O. Box 110570, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0570, USA.

Waterborne Environmental, Inc., 897-B Harrison Street S.E., Leesburg, VA, 20175, USA.

出版信息

Water Res. 2019 Nov 15;165:114983. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114983. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

Abstract

Recent advances in mechanistic modeling of vegetated filter strips (VFS) have made it possible to incorporate VFS mitigation into environmental exposure assessments (EEAs). However, outside of fixed efficiency approaches, there are no widely adopted and standardized procedures for incorporating VFS quantitative mitigation into long-term, higher-tier EEAs. A source of hesitation involves the use of empirical equations for predicting pesticide trapping by the VFS. A recent study evaluated existing empirical equations and a mechanistic mass-balance approach using the most extensive field database available of VFS pesticide efficiency from single-event storms. That study concluded that an updated empirical equation (Sabbagh equation) and a mechanistic mass-balance approach performed reasonably well. The objective of this research was to study the effect of upscaling the VFS trapping equations from single events into long-term EEAs. The U.S. EPA Pesticide in Water Calculator (PWC) model linked with the Vegetative Filter Strip MODeling system (VFSMOD) long-term EEA modeling framework (30 yr) was updated to incorporate the alternative trapping equations and tested VFS mitigation results under contrasting agroecological settings with varying erosion/sediment transport conditions. Differences in both acute and chronic 90th percentile estimated environmental exposure concentrations (EECs) were relatively small when comparing predictions using the four pesticide trapping equations. A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) also indicated that selection of a specific trapping equation for predicting EECs was less important than other important input factors such as the VFS length and pesticide properties. However, in terms of the percent reductions in EECs, the choice of pesticide trapping equation was as important as the VFS length. This research builds upon the conclusion of previous single-event studies that the mechanistic mass-balance and refit Sabbagh empirical equation were both valid for EEAs. The mass balance approach represents a reasonable option for regulatory agencies that prefer mechanistic approaches.

摘要

近年来,植被过滤带(VFS)的机械建模取得了进展,使得将 VFS 缓解措施纳入环境暴露评估(EEA)成为可能。然而,除了固定效率方法之外,没有广泛采用和标准化的程序将 VFS 的定量缓解措施纳入长期、更高层次的 EEA。犹豫的一个原因涉及使用经验公式来预测 VFS 对农药的截留。最近的一项研究评估了现有的经验公式和机械质量平衡方法,使用了最广泛的 VFS 农药效率的现场数据库,这些数据来自单次事件风暴。该研究得出结论,一个经过更新的经验公式(Sabbagh 方程)和机械质量平衡方法表现相当好。本研究的目的是研究将 VFS 截留方程从单次事件扩展到长期 EEA 的效果。美国环保署的农药在水中计算器(PWC)模型与植被过滤带建模系统(VFSMOD)长期 EEA 建模框架(30 年)相链接,更新后纳入替代截留方程,并在具有不同侵蚀/泥沙输送条件的不同农业生态环境下测试 VFS 缓解结果。在比较使用四种农药截留方程的预测时,急性和慢性第 90 百分位估计环境暴露浓度(EEC)的差异相对较小。全局敏感性分析(GSA)还表明,选择特定的截留方程来预测 EEC 比其他重要输入因素(如 VFS 长度和农药特性)的重要性要小。然而,就 EEC 的减少百分比而言,选择农药截留方程与 VFS 长度同样重要。本研究建立在之前单次事件研究的结论之上,即机械质量平衡和重新拟合的 Sabbagh 经验公式都适用于 EEA。质量平衡方法是监管机构的一个合理选择,他们更喜欢机械方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验