Suppr超能文献

弱视中的等效内在模糊

Equivalent intrinsic blur in amblyopia.

作者信息

Levi D M, Klein S A

机构信息

University of Houston, College of Optometry, TX 77004.

出版信息

Vision Res. 1990;30(12):1995-2022. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90017-f.

Abstract

We used Gaussian blurred stimuli to explore the effect of blur on three tasks: (i) 2-line resolution; (ii) line detection; and (iii) spatial interval discrimination, in observers with amblyopia due to anisometropia, strabismus, or both. The results of our experiments can be summarized as follows. (i) 2-Line resolution: in normal foveal vision, thresholds for unblurred stimuli are approx. 0.5 min arc in the fovea. When the standard deviation (sigma) of the stimulus blur is less than 0.5 min, it has little effect upon 2-line resolution; however, thresholds are degraded when the stimulus blur, sigma, exceeds 0.5 min. We operationally define this transition point, as the equivalent intrinsic blur, or Bi. When the stimulus blur, sigma, is greater than Bi, then the resolution threshold is approximately equal to sigma. In all of the amblyopic eyes, 2-line resolution thresholds for unblurred stimuli were elevated, and the equivalent intrinsic blur was much larger. When the stimulus blur exceeds the equivalent intrinsic blur, resolution thresholds were similar in amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes. (ii) Line detection: in both normal and amblyopic eyes, when the stimulus blur, sigma, is less than Bi, then the line detection threshold is approximately inversely proportional to sigma; i.e. (it obeys Ricco's law). When sigma is greater than Bi, the equivalent intrinsic blur, then the detection threshold is approximately a fixed contrast. All of the amblyopic eyes showed markedly elevated thresholds for detecting thin lines, but normal or near normal thresholds for detecting very blurred lines. Consequently, Ricco's diameter is larger in amblyopic than in normal eyes. (iii) Spatial interval discrimination: thresholds are proportional to the separation of the lines (i.e. Weber's law). At the optimal separation, spatial interval discrimination thresholds represent a "hyperacuity" (i.e. they are smaller than the resolution threshold). For unblurred lines, the optimal separation is approx. 2-3 times Bi. In the normal fovea, and in the amblyopic eyes of anisometropic amblyopes the optimal spatial interval discrimination threshold is about one-fifth of the resolution threshold (i.e. a hyperacuity); and over a wide range of separations, spatial interval discrimination thresholds begin to rise when the stimulus blur exceeds about one-third of the separation between the lines as long as the contrast is sufficiently high. In contrast, in strabismic amblyopes, like the normal periphery, the optimal spatial interval discrimination thresholds are worse (higher) than would be expected based upon the resolution limit of the strabismic amblyopic eye.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

我们使用高斯模糊刺激来探究模糊对三项任务的影响

(i)两线分辨力;(ii)线条检测;以及(iii)空间间隔辨别,实验对象为患有屈光参差性弱视、斜视性弱视或两者皆有的弱视观察者。我们的实验结果可总结如下。(i)两线分辨力:在正常中央凹视力中,未模糊刺激的阈值在中央凹约为0.5分视角。当刺激模糊的标准差(sigma)小于0.5分时,它对两线分辨力影响不大;然而,当刺激模糊(sigma)超过0.5分时,阈值会下降。我们将这个转变点定义为等效固有模糊或Bi。当刺激模糊(sigma)大于Bi时,分辨阈值大约等于sigma。在所有弱视眼中,未模糊刺激的两线分辨阈值升高,且等效固有模糊要大得多。当刺激模糊超过等效固有模糊时,弱视眼和非弱视眼的分辨阈值相似。(ii)线条检测:在正常眼和弱视眼中,当刺激模糊(sigma)小于Bi时,线条检测阈值大约与sigma成反比;即(它遵循里科定律)。当sigma大于等效固有模糊Bi时,检测阈值大约是一个固定对比度。所有弱视眼在检测细线时阈值明显升高,但在检测非常模糊的线条时阈值正常或接近正常。因此,弱视眼中的里科直径比正常眼大。(iii)空间间隔辨别:阈值与线条间距成正比(即韦伯定律)。在最佳间距时,空间间隔辨别阈值代表一种“超敏锐度”(即它们小于分辨阈值)。对于未模糊线条,最佳间距约为Bi的2 - 3倍。在正常中央凹以及屈光参差性弱视眼的弱视眼中,最佳空间间隔辨别阈值约为分辨阈值的五分之一(即超敏锐度);并且在很宽的间距范围内,只要对比度足够高,当刺激模糊超过线条间距的约三分之一时,空间间隔辨别阈值就开始上升。相比之下,在斜视性弱视眼中,与正常周边情况一样,最佳空间间隔辨别阈值比基于斜视性弱视眼的分辨极限所预期的更差(更高)。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验