Levi D M, Klein S A
Vision Res. 1983;23(10):1005-17. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90011-1.
Spatial localization was investigated for each eye of amblyopic observers using a bisection paradigm. The stimuli were comprised of a grating composed of bright lines, and a test line. The test line was either placed above the grating (bisection-no overlap) or within the row of lines comprising the grating (bisection-with overlap) and thresholds for each bisection task were measured as a function of the fundamental spatial frequency of the grating. Vernier thresholds were also measured. For the nonamblyopic eyes at low spatial frequencies, bisection thresholds were a constant fraction ("Weber" fraction) of the space to be bisected, while at high spatial frequencies thresholds were approximately a constant retinal distance (a hyperacuity). However the spatial localization of an amblyopic eye depends upon both the type of amblyopia, and the stimulus configuration. Specifically, for anisometropic amblyopia, spatial localization (bisection-no overlap) and vernier, when scaled to the resolution losses, were normal. However, spatial adjacency (bisection with overlap), while enhancing the spatial localization of nonamblyopic eyes at high spatial frequencies, markedly elevated thresholds in the amblyopic eyes of anisometropic amblyopes. Strabismic amblyopes on the other hand show disturbances in both spatial localization tasks which can not be accounted for on the basis of reduced resolution. Their results are characterized by an absence of a constant Weber fraction at low spatial frequencies and "crowding" effects at high spatial frequencies. For strabismic amblyopes, the optimal localization thresholds were similar to the Snellen threshold, while for anisometropic amblyopes, the optimal localization thresholds were several times better than the Snellen threshold.
使用二等分范式对弱视观察者的每只眼睛进行空间定位研究。刺激物由由亮线组成的光栅和一条测试线组成。测试线要么置于光栅上方(二等分 - 无重叠),要么置于构成光栅的线列内(二等分 - 有重叠),并将每个二等分任务的阈值作为光栅基本空间频率的函数进行测量。还测量了游标阈值。对于非弱视眼在低空间频率下,二等分阈值是要二等分空间的一个恒定分数(“韦伯”分数),而在高空间频率下阈值大约是一个恒定的视网膜距离(一种超敏锐度)。然而,弱视眼的空间定位取决于弱视的类型和刺激配置。具体而言,对于屈光参差性弱视,空间定位(二等分 - 无重叠)和游标,当按分辨率损失进行缩放时,是正常的。然而,空间邻接(有重叠的二等分),虽然在高空间频率下增强了非弱视眼的空间定位,但显著提高了屈光参差性弱视患者弱视眼的阈值。另一方面,斜视性弱视患者在两项空间定位任务中均表现出干扰,这无法基于分辨率降低来解释。他们的结果表现为在低空间频率下不存在恒定的韦伯分数,在高空间频率下存在“拥挤”效应。对于斜视性弱视患者,最佳定位阈值与斯内伦阈值相似,而对于屈光参差性弱视患者,最佳定位阈值比斯内伦阈值好几倍。