Chun Kr Julian, Bordignon Stefano, Gunawardene Melanie, Urban Verena, Kulikoglu Mehmet, Schulte-Hahn Britta, Nowak Bernd, Schmidt Boris
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;35(11):1304-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03475.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
The single big cryoballon technique for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been limited by the need for two transseptal punctures (TP). We therefore investigated feasibility and safety of a simplified approach using a single TP and a novel circumferential mapping catheter (CMC).
Patients underwent 28-mm cryoballoon PVI using a single TP. The CMC (Achieve(©) Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) served as (1) guidewire and (2) as a PV mapping tool. Primary endpoint was PVI without switching to a regular guidewire. Secondary endpoints included: (1) PV signal quality during freezing, (2) time to PVI, (3) classification of successful ablation technique, (4) complications, and (5) procedural data.
A total of 32 patients (126 PVs) were studied (mean age: 62 ± 11 years, 24 males, left atrium: 40 ± 4 mm). The primary endpoint was achieved in 29/32 patients (91%) and 123/126 PVs (98%) with a procedure and fluoroscopy time of 126 ± 26 minutes and 18.9 ± 7.5 minutes, respectively. Real-time visualization of PVI could be observed in 61/126 (48%) PVs. Time to sustained PVI versus nonsustained PVI was 66 ± 56 seconds versus 129 ± 76 seconds (P < 0.001). One phrenic nerve palsy was observed. After a follow-up of 250 ± 84 days 23/32 patients (72%) remained in sinus rhythm.
The "simplified single big cryoballoon" PVI strategy appears to be safe and feasible. However, real-time PV recording was achieved in <50% of PVs. Therefore, further catheter refinements are warranted. (PACE 2012; 35:1304-1311).
用于肺静脉隔离(PVI)的单一大冷冻球囊技术因需要两次经房间隔穿刺(TP)而受到限制。因此,我们研究了使用单次TP和新型环形标测导管(CMC)的简化方法的可行性和安全性。
患者使用单次TP接受28毫米冷冻球囊PVI。CMC(美国明尼阿波利斯美敦力公司的Achieve(©))用作(1)导丝和(2)肺静脉标测工具。主要终点是不更换为常规导丝的PVI。次要终点包括:(1)冷冻期间肺静脉信号质量,(2)达到PVI的时间,(3)成功消融技术的分类,(4)并发症,以及(5)手术数据。
共研究了32例患者(126条肺静脉)(平均年龄:62±11岁,男性24例,左心房:40±4毫米)。29/32例患者(91%)和123/126条肺静脉(98%)达到主要终点,手术时间和透视时间分别为126±26分钟和18.9±7.5分钟。61/126(48%)条肺静脉可观察到PVI的实时可视化。达到持续性PVI与非持续性PVI的时间分别为66±56秒和129±76秒(P<0.001)。观察到1例膈神经麻痹。随访250±84天后,23/32例患者(72%)维持窦性心律。
“简化单一大冷冻球囊”PVI策略似乎安全可行。然而,不到50%的肺静脉实现了实时记录。因此,需要进一步改进导管。(《PACE》2012年;35:1304 - 1311)