Suppr超能文献

最早的肺静脉电位引导下的冷冻球囊消融治疗心房颤动。

Earliest pulmonary vein potential-guided cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Mizutani Yoshiaki, Kanashiro Masaaki, Makino Yuichiro, Satake Akinori, Suzuki Wataru, Kurobe Masanari, Mizutani Kouji, Ichimiya Hitoshi, Uchida Yasuhiro, Watanabe Junji, Ichimiya Satoshi, Inden Yasuya, Murohara Toyoaki

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, 2-2-37, Shibata, Yokkaichi, Mie, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2020 Feb;35(2):232-238. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01471-5. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Abstract

No studies have evaluated both the time-to-isolation (TTI) and the sequence of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials in cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the acute results of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a novel CBA technique-the earliest potential (EP) of PV-guided CBA-in paroxysmal AF. We pressed a balloon against the earliest PV potential site during PVI when TTI could not be achieved within 60 s (EP-guided CBA group). We compared 32 patients consecutively treated by EP-guided CBA to 32 patients treated without pressing the balloon against the EP site (conventional CBA group). The cryoapplication protocol was the same, except with regard to the pressing of the balloon. All 256 PVs (EP-guided CBA group, 128 PVs; conventional CBA group, 128 PVs) were isolated successfully. The TTI observation rate was similar in both groups. Compared with conventional CBA, EP-guided CBA was associated with a lower non-success rate of TTI ≤ 90 s (9% vs. 26%; P = 0.040) and shorter left atrial dwell time (38 ± 9 vs. 46 ± 19 min; P = 0.036), total procedure time (76 ± 15 vs. 87 ± 23 min; P = 0.043), and fluoroscopy time (23 ± 8 vs. 30 ± 11 min; P = 0.006). This novel EP-guided CBA approach may help facilitate the ablation procedure.

摘要

尚无研究评估冷冻球囊消融术(CBA)治疗心房颤动(AF)时的隔离时间(TTI)和肺静脉(PV)电位顺序。本研究旨在前瞻性评估采用新型CBA技术——PV引导的CBA最早电位(EP)——对阵发性AF进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)的急性结果。在PVI期间,当60秒内无法实现TTI时,我们将球囊按压在最早的PV电位部位(EP引导的CBA组)。我们将32例连续接受EP引导的CBA治疗的患者与32例未将球囊按压在EP部位的患者(传统CBA组)进行比较。除球囊按压外,冷冻应用方案相同。所有256条PV(EP引导的CBA组128条PV;传统CBA组128条PV)均成功隔离。两组的TTI观察率相似。与传统CBA相比,EP引导的CBA的TTI≤90秒的未成功率较低(9%对26%;P=0.040),左心房停留时间较短(38±9对46±19分钟;P=0.036),总手术时间较短(76±15对87±23分钟;P=0.043),透视时间较短(23±8对30±11分钟;P=0.006)。这种新型的EP引导的CBA方法可能有助于促进消融手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验