From the Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Nov;20(11):1203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01549.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
Cryoballoon (CB) ablation represents a novel technology for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We investigated feasibility and safety of CB-PVI, utilizing a novel spiral catheter (SC), thereby obtaining real-time PV potential registration.
Following double transseptal puncture, a Lasso catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and the 28 mm CB were positioned within the left atrium. A novel SC (Promap, ProRhythm Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY, USA) was inserted through the lumen of the CB allowing PV signal registration during treatment. Time to PV conduction block was analyzed. If no stable balloon position was obtained, the SC was exchanged for a regular guide wire and PV conduction was assessed after treatment by Lasso catheter.
In 18 patients, 39 of 72 PVs (54%) were successfully isolated using the SC. The remaining 33 PVs were isolated switching to the regular guide wire. Time to PV conduction block was significantly shorter in PVs in which sustained PVI was achieved as compared to PVs in which PV conduction recovered within 30 minutes (33 +/- 21 seconds vs 99 +/- 65 seconds). In 40 PVs, time to PV conduction block was not obtained because of: (1) PVI not being achieved during initial treatment; (2) a distal position of the SC; or (3) isolation with regular guide wire. No procedural complications occurred.
Visualization of real-time PV conduction during CB PVI is safe, feasible, and allows accurate timing of PVI onset in a subset of PVs. Time to PV conduction block predicts sustained PVI. However, mechanical properties of the SC need to be improved to further simplify CB PVI.
冷冻球囊(CB)消融代表了一种用于肺静脉隔离(PVI)的新型技术。我们研究了使用新型螺旋导管(SC)进行 CB-PVI 的可行性和安全性,从而实现了实时 PV 电位记录。
在进行双房隔穿刺后,将 Lasso 导管(Biosense Webster,Diamond Bar,CA,USA)和 28mm 的 CB 置于左心房内。将新型 SC(Promap,ProRhythm Inc.,Ronkonkoma,NY,USA)通过 CB 的内腔插入,允许在治疗过程中记录 PV 信号。分析 PV 传导阻滞的时间。如果未获得稳定的球囊位置,则将 SC 更换为常规导丝,并在治疗后使用 Lasso 导管评估 PV 传导。
在 18 名患者中,使用 SC 成功隔离了 72 个 PV 中的 39 个(54%)。其余 33 个 PV 在切换到常规导丝后被隔离。与在 30 分钟内恢复 PV 传导的 PV 相比,成功维持 PVI 的 PV 中达到 PV 传导阻滞的时间明显更短(33±21 秒比 99±65 秒)。在 40 个 PV 中,由于以下原因未获得 PV 传导阻滞的时间:(1)初始治疗期间未实现 PVI;(2)SC 的远端位置;或(3)使用常规导丝进行隔离。没有发生程序并发症。
在 CB-PVI 过程中可视化实时 PV 传导是安全、可行的,并允许在一部分 PV 中准确计时 PVI 的开始。PV 传导阻滞的时间预测持续的 PVI。然而,需要改进 SC 的机械性能,以进一步简化 CB-PVI。