Plakht Ygal, Shiyovich Arthur, Nusbaum Lika, Raizer Haya
Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Leon and Matilda Recanati School for Community Health Professions, the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Oct;33(10):1264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
Providing consistent and high-quality feedback is a crucial component of clinical instruction. Such feedback can improve the students' ability to reflect themselves more accurately. However, giving feedback, especially negative is intricate.
To evaluate the level of feedback provided to nursing students during clinical practice and investigate their association with related outcomes, such us clinical performance, self-evaluation of achievements and contribution of the practice to the professional skills.
Cross-sectional study.
124 third-year nursing students during their "Emergency Nursing" (EN) clinical practice were instructed, criticized and graded by three teachers from the university staff.
Following their clinical practice the students filled-out a questionnaire, in which they evaluated the feedback provided by their teachers, the contribution of the practice to their professional skills and their personal performance. Additionally, the teachers' grades of students' achievements were collected. Accuracy of students' self-evaluation was calculated as the arithmetical difference between the students' grades and the teachers' grades.
The mean grades of positive and negative feedback were 74.5/100 and 70.7/100, respectively. Higher-quality positive feedback was associated with higher teachers' grade (p=0.027) and with "very high" evaluation of the contribution of the practice (p=0.022). Higher-quality positive feedback was associated with student's over-self-evaluation (p=0.02), whereas higher-quality negative feedback was associated with more accurate self-evaluation (p=0.015).
High-quality positive feedback is associated with higher grades, higher contribution of the clinical practice to the student and over-self-evaluation whereas high-quality negative feedback is related to an accurate self evaluation of the students' performance. Teachers should pay more attention to administering high-quality positive and negative feedback.
提供一致且高质量的反馈是临床教学的关键组成部分。此类反馈可提高学生更准确地反思自身的能力。然而,给予反馈,尤其是负面反馈很复杂。
评估临床实习期间给予护理专业学生的反馈水平,并调查其与相关结果的关联,如临床实践表现、对自身成就的自我评价以及该实践对专业技能的贡献。
横断面研究。
124名三年级护理专业学生在进行“急诊护理”临床实习期间,由三位大学教师进行指导、批评和评分。
临床实习结束后,学生填写一份问卷,评估教师提供的反馈、该实践对其专业技能的贡献以及他们的个人表现。此外,收集教师对学生成绩的评分。学生自我评价的准确性通过计算学生成绩与教师成绩之间的算术差值得出。
正面反馈和负面反馈的平均分数分别为74.5/100和70.7/100。更高质量的正面反馈与教师更高的评分相关(p = 0.027),与对实践贡献的“非常高”评价相关(p = 0.022)。更高质量的正面反馈与学生的过度自我评价相关(p = 0.02),而更高质量的负面反馈与更准确的自我评价相关(p = 0.015)。
高质量的正面反馈与更高的评分、临床实践对学生的更高贡献以及过度自我评价相关,而高质量的负面反馈与学生表现的准确自我评价相关。教师应更加注重给予高质量的正面和负面反馈。