Kelly Claudette
Thompson Rivers University, Nursing Department, P.O. Box 3010, Kamloops, BC, Canada V2C 5N3.
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Nov;27(8):885-92. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
Despite a wealth of research on clinical teaching, the criteria for determining what constitutes effective clinical teaching remain poorly defined [Cholowski, K., 2002. Nursing students' and clinical educators' perceptions of characteristics of effective clinical educators in an Australian university school of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 39 (5), 412-420]. This paper reports on two studies exploring second and third year nursing student's perceptions of effective clinical teaching over 14 years (1989-2003). The aim of the inquiry was to compare student's perceptions in diploma and baccalaureate programs within existing clinical contexts. This research used a generative approach to elicit learner's views of what teacher characteristics and contextual influences impact them in clinical settings. A convenience sample of 30 students at the end of second and third years volunteered to be interviewed in-depth for each study. The first study was conducted in a diploma program, whereas in the second study all but a few students were elected to complete a four year baccalaureate nursing degree. Findings from both studies are remarkably consistent. Students in both studies rated teacher knowledge as most important followed by feedback and communication skills. Teacher knowledge appeared critical in four areas: as it pertains to the clinical setting, the curriculum, the learner and teaching/learning theory. How well students perceived that they were accepted by staff, student-teacher ratios and peer support also appeared to impact student's views of effective clinical teaching. This research has implications for employment and evaluation practices for teachers in applied fields such as nursing. The study raises questions about the recent trend toward temporary employment of clinical teachers and in the separation of academic and clinical roles of nurse educators.
尽管对临床教学进行了大量研究,但对于有效临床教学的构成标准仍定义不清[乔洛斯基,K.,2002年。澳大利亚一所大学护理学院中护理专业学生和临床教育工作者对有效临床教育工作者特征的看法。《高级护理杂志》39(5),412 - 420]。本文报告了两项研究,探讨了14年(1989 - 2003年)间护理专业二、三年级学生对有效临床教学的看法。该调查的目的是在现有临床环境中比较文凭课程和学士学位课程学生的看法。本研究采用生成性方法来引出学习者对教师特征和情境影响在临床环境中如何影响他们的看法。每项研究均选取了30名二、三年级结束时的学生作为便利样本,自愿接受深入访谈。第一项研究在文凭课程中进行,而第二项研究中除少数学生外,其余学生均攻读四年制护理学学士学位。两项研究的结果非常一致。两项研究中的学生都将教师知识评为最重要,其次是反馈和沟通技巧。教师知识在四个方面显得至关重要:与临床环境、课程、学习者以及教学理论相关。学生认为自己被工作人员接受的程度、师生比和同伴支持似乎也会影响学生对有效临床教学的看法。这项研究对护理等应用领域教师的聘用和评估实践具有启示意义。该研究对临床教师临时聘用的近期趋势以及护士教育工作者学术和临床角色的分离提出了质疑。