• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早孕期胎儿面部轮廓标记的临床价值。

Clinical value of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 6 Huanghe Street, Changshu, 215500, Jiangsu, China.

Center for Medical Ultrasound, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, No. 26 Daoqian Street, Suzhou, 215002, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 2;22(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05028-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-05028-9
PMID:36184592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9526988/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the correlations between facial profile markers and crown-lump length (CRL) in a Chinese population, and to evaluate the clinical value of these markers for abnormal fetuses during the first trimester (11 to 13 gestational weeks).  METHODS: The facial profile markers were as followings: inferior facial angle (IFA), maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle, facial maxillary angle (FMA), frontal space (FS) distance and profile line (PL) distance. These markers were measured in facial mid-sagittal section through ViewPoint 6 software. The diagnostic value of these markers for abnormal fetuses was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

According to the first-trimester scanning (FTS) and follow-up, 31 fetuses were enrolled in the abnormal group, including 14 cases of trisomy 21, 7 cases of trisomy 18, 10 cases with cleft lip and palate (CLP), and 1000 normal fetuses were selected. Among the normal fetuses, the IFA, FS distance and PL distance had negative correlations with CRL. The MNM angle and FMA had positive correlations with CRL. The mean IFA values for fetuses with trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 were 74.11° (standard deviation (SD) 7.48) and 69.88° (SD 7.08), respectively, which were significantly smaller than the normal fetuses (p = 0.013; p = 0.003). The mean MNM angle of fetuses with trisomy 18 and CLP were 6.98° (SD 2.61) and 9.41° (SD 2.57), respectively, which were significantly greater than the normal fetuses (p = 0.005; p < 0.001). The mean FMA values of trisomy 18 fetuses were 63.95° (SD 4.77), which was significantly smaller than the normal fetuses (p < 0.001). The mean FS distance of CLP fetuses was -0.22 mm (SD 1.38), which was significantly smaller than the normal fetuses (p < 0.001). The mean PL distance of trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and CLP fetuses were 2.89 mm (SD 0.41), 2.91 mm (SD 0.56) and 2.71 mm (SD 0.37), respectively. The difference with the normal fetuses had no statistical significance (p = 0.56; p = 0.607; p = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal facial profile markers had excellent correlations with CRL during the first trimester. IFA had certain clinical significance in detecting trisomy 21. FMA, IFA and MNM angle were reliable indicators for screening trisomy 18. The abnormal MNM angle and FS distance could be used as sensitive indicators for CLP. However, PL distance was not the best markers for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and CLP.

摘要

目的

研究中国人面部轮廓标志与冠臀长(CRL)之间的相关性,并评估这些标志在孕早期(11-13 孕周)用于异常胎儿的临床价值。

方法

面部轮廓标志如下:下面部角(IFA)、上颌-鼻根-下颌(MNM)角、面上部角(FMA)、额面间距(FS)和轮廓线(PL)距离。通过 ViewPoint 6 软件在面部正中矢状面测量这些标志。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估这些标志对异常胎儿的诊断价值。

结果

根据孕早期扫描(FTS)和随访,31 例胎儿被纳入异常组,包括 14 例 21 三体,7 例 18 三体,10 例唇腭裂(CLP),1000 例正常胎儿。在正常胎儿中,IFA、FS 距离和 PL 距离与 CRL 呈负相关。MNM 角和 FMA 与 CRL 呈正相关。21 三体和 18 三体胎儿的 IFA 平均值分别为 74.11°(标准差(SD)7.48)和 69.88°(SD 7.08),显著小于正常胎儿(p=0.013;p=0.003)。18 三体和 CLP 胎儿的 MNM 角平均值分别为 6.98°(SD 2.61)和 9.41°(SD 2.57),显著大于正常胎儿(p=0.005;p<0.001)。18 三体胎儿的 FMA 平均值为 63.95°(SD 4.77),显著小于正常胎儿(p<0.001)。CLP 胎儿的 FS 距离平均值为-0.22mm(SD 1.38),显著小于正常胎儿(p<0.001)。21 三体、18 三体和 CLP 胎儿的 PL 距离平均值分别为 2.89mm(SD 0.41)、2.91mm(SD 0.56)和 2.71mm(SD 0.37),与正常胎儿相比差异无统计学意义(p=0.56;p=0.607;p=0.54)。

结论

孕早期胎儿面部轮廓标志与 CRL 相关性良好。IFA 在检测 21 三体方面具有一定的临床意义。FMA、IFA 和 MNM 角是筛查 18 三体的可靠指标。异常的 MNM 角和 FS 距离可作为 CLP 的敏感指标。然而,PL 距离并不是 21 三体、18 三体和 CLP 的最佳标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/4b2c4e4fe87d/12884_2022_5028_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/cffe160115ba/12884_2022_5028_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/8fe5b4105afd/12884_2022_5028_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/0b0a6a022131/12884_2022_5028_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/fc4ee14f342b/12884_2022_5028_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/f55fe4ac4e9c/12884_2022_5028_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/c7732c9d2198/12884_2022_5028_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/b6747f35937b/12884_2022_5028_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/e224b6b10ad2/12884_2022_5028_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/4b2c4e4fe87d/12884_2022_5028_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/cffe160115ba/12884_2022_5028_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/8fe5b4105afd/12884_2022_5028_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/0b0a6a022131/12884_2022_5028_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/fc4ee14f342b/12884_2022_5028_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/f55fe4ac4e9c/12884_2022_5028_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/c7732c9d2198/12884_2022_5028_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/b6747f35937b/12884_2022_5028_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/e224b6b10ad2/12884_2022_5028_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7eb/9526988/4b2c4e4fe87d/12884_2022_5028_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical value of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester.早孕期胎儿面部轮廓标记的临床价值。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 2;22(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05028-9.
2
A novel artificial intelligence model for fetal facial profile marker measurement during the first trimester.一种新型人工智能模型,用于测量胎儿面部轮廓标记在早孕期间的变化。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06046-x.
3
Ultrasonographic study of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester.早孕期胎儿面部轮廓标记的超声研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 24;21(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03813-6.
4
Facial profile markers in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18.孕中期和孕晚期18三体胎儿的面部轮廓标志物
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/uog.14662.
5
Prenasal Thickness, Prefrontal Space Ratio and Other Facial Profile Markers in First-Trimester Fetuses with Aneuploidies, Cleft Palate, and Micrognathia.孕早期患非整倍体、腭裂和小颌畸形胎儿的鼻前厚度、前额空间比例及其他面部轮廓指标
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43(3):231-240. doi: 10.1159/000449099. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Fetal facial profile markers of Down syndrome in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.妊娠中晚期唐氏综合征胎儿面部轮廓标记物。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):168-73. doi: 10.1002/uog.14720. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Frontal space distance in facial clefts and retrognathia at 11-13 weeks' gestation.孕11 - 13周时面部裂隙和下颌后缩的额部间隙距离
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;48(2):171-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.15823.
8
Study on normal reference value of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester of pregnancy.孕早期胎儿面部轮廓标志物正常参考值的研究。
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jan;11(1):99-107. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-573.
9
Frontomaxillary facial angle in screening for trisomy 21 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks.孕11⁺⁰至13⁺⁶周时,额上颌面部角在21-三体综合征筛查中的应用
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;32(1):5-11. doi: 10.1002/uog.5334.
10
Maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle: an indicator to assess fetal facial profile in first-trimester of pregnancy.上颌骨-鼻根点-下颌骨(MNM)角:一种在妊娠早期评估胎儿面部轮廓的指标。
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 11;5(1):1335. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2944-4. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel artificial intelligence model for fetal facial profile marker measurement during the first trimester.一种新型人工智能模型,用于测量胎儿面部轮廓标记在早孕期间的变化。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06046-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasonographic study of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester.早孕期胎儿面部轮廓标记的超声研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 24;21(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03813-6.
2
Objective assessment of the fetal facial profile at second and third trimester of pregnancy.评估胎儿面部轮廓在妊娠第二和第三孕期的客观表现。
Prenat Diagn. 2019 Jan;39(2):107-115. doi: 10.1002/pd.5371. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
Prenasal Thickness, Prefrontal Space Ratio and Other Facial Profile Markers in First-Trimester Fetuses with Aneuploidies, Cleft Palate, and Micrognathia.
孕早期患非整倍体、腭裂和小颌畸形胎儿的鼻前厚度、前额空间比例及其他面部轮廓指标
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43(3):231-240. doi: 10.1159/000449099. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Contribution of genomic copy-number variations in prenatal oral clefts: a multicenter cohort study.基因组拷贝数变异在产前唇腭裂中的作用:一项多中心队列研究。
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):1052-5. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.216. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
5
Frontal space distance in facial clefts and retrognathia at 11-13 weeks' gestation.孕11 - 13周时面部裂隙和下颌后缩的额部间隙距离
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;48(2):171-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.15823.
6
A practical prenatal ultrasound classification system for common oral clefts.一种常见口腔腭裂的实用产前超声分类系统。
Prenat Diagn. 2015 Sep;35(9):894-900. doi: 10.1002/pd.4631. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
The frontal space measurement in euploid and aneuploid pregnancies at 11-13 weeks' gestation.孕11至13周时整倍体和非整倍体妊娠的额部空间测量。
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Dec;33(12):1124-30. doi: 10.1002/pd.4205. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
Illustrated review of the embryology and development of the facial region, part 2: Late development of the fetal face and changes in the face from the newborn to adulthood.面部区域胚胎学与发育的图解综述,第2部分:胎儿面部的后期发育以及从新生儿到成年期面部的变化
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):10-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3414. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
9
Illustrated review of the embryology and development of the facial region, part 1: Early face and lateral nasal cavities.面部区域胚胎学与发育的图示综述,第1部分:早期面部与外侧鼻腔
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;34(12):2233-40. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3415. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
10
A systematic review of associated structural and chromosomal defects in oral clefts: when is prenatal genetic analysis indicated?口腔裂相关结构和染色体缺陷的系统评价:何时需要进行产前基因分析?
J Med Genet. 2012 Aug;49(8):490-8. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101013.