Suppr超能文献

腭裂儿童早期言语干预的系统评价

A systematic review of early speech interventions for children with cleft palate.

作者信息

Lane Hannah, Harding Sam, Wren Yvonne

机构信息

Speech and Language Therapy, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK.

Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):226-245. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12683. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) are at high risk of problems with early speech sound production, and these difficulties can persist into later childhood. Early intervention could help to reduce the number of children whose problems become persistent. However, much research in the field to date has focused on older children. There is a need to determine if providing intervention during the phase of early typical speech development leads to better outcomes.

AIMS

To review the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions targeting speech, delivered in the first 3 years of life for children with CP±L, and discuss factors such as intervention type, facilitator, dosage, outcome measures and the age of the child.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019121964). Eight bibliographic databases including CINAHL and MEDLINE were searched in August 2018. Studies were included if participants received speech and language interventions before 37 months and if they reported outcomes for speech. Two reviewers independently completed inclusion reviews, quality analysis and data extraction.

OUTCOME & RESULTS: The review included seven papers: one pilot randomized controlled trial, one controlled trial, four cohort studies and one case series report. Interventions largely took a naturalistic approach, namely focused stimulation and milieu teaching. The findings provide preliminary support for naturalistic interventions and suggest that these interventions can be delivered by parents with suitable training. Studies included in the review provided low-strength evidence with variation in both the type of intervention, the manner of delivery and in the risk of bias in the designs used.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The papers included in this review suggest that early naturalistic interventions can have positive impacts on the speech development of children with CP±L. However, the reported methodological quality of the publications overall was weak, and the current evidence lacks clarity and specificity in terms of therapy technique, delivery and optimum age of delivery. Future research should use more robust methodological designs to determine whether early speech interventions are beneficial for children born with CP±L.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Children with CP±L show difficulties with early speech development and often have restricted speech sound inventories. They may reach the canonical babbling stage later than children without CP±L and studies have shown that 20% of children with CP±L have speech which is considered unintelligible or barely intelligible at age 5. It has been proposed that early intervention can lessen the impact of CP±L on speech development. However, currently, the evidence for early interventions for children with CP±L is limited, with the majority of studies focusing on children aged 3 years and older. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper reviews the evidence for different types of early interventions for speech provided to children born with CP±L and whether these interventions are effective in supporting speech sound development. In this review, early intervention is defined as intervention provided to children in the first 3 years of life. This review describes intervention approaches and how they are delivered for this population. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? In the UK, children born with CP±L and their families are supported by National Health Service (NHS) services over a 20-year period and speech and language therapy sessions may take place over many weeks and months. If providing early intervention in the first 3 years of life is effective, there is the potential for improved speech outcomes in early childhood and a reduced burden of care on children, families and services. This review considers the evidence for early speech intervention for children with CP±L in the first 3 years of life and identifies areas for future research.

摘要

背景

患有唇腭裂(CP±L)的儿童在早期语音产生方面存在问题的风险很高,而且这些困难可能会持续到童年后期。早期干预有助于减少问题持续存在的儿童数量。然而,该领域迄今为止的许多研究都集中在年龄较大的儿童身上。有必要确定在早期典型语音发展阶段提供干预是否能带来更好的结果。

目的

回顾针对CP±L儿童在生命的前3年进行的语音干预有效性的证据,并讨论干预类型、促进者、剂量、结果测量和儿童年龄等因素。

方法与程序

该系统评价已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号CRD42019121964)登记。2018年8月检索了包括护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)和医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)在内的8个文献数据库。纳入的研究要求参与者在37个月之前接受言语和语言干预,并且报告语音方面的结果。两名评价者独立完成纳入评价、质量分析和数据提取。

结果

该评价纳入了7篇论文:1篇试点随机对照试验、1篇对照试验、4篇队列研究和1篇病例系列报告。干预措施大多采用自然主义方法,即聚焦刺激和情境教学。研究结果为自然主义干预提供了初步支持,并表明这些干预可以由经过适当培训的家长实施。纳入评价的研究提供的证据强度较低,干预类型、实施方式以及所用设计中的偏倚风险均存在差异。

结论与启示

本评价纳入的论文表明,早期自然主义干预对CP±L儿童的语音发展可能有积极影响。然而,所报告的出版物总体方法学质量较弱,目前的证据在治疗技术、实施方式和最佳实施年龄方面缺乏清晰度和特异性。未来的研究应采用更可靠的方法学设计,以确定早期语音干预对CP±L患儿是否有益。

本文补充的内容

关于该主题已知的信息:CP±L儿童在早期语音发展方面存在困难,且语音库往往受限。他们可能比非CP±L儿童更晚达到典型牙牙学语阶段,研究表明,20%的CP±L儿童在5岁时的语音被认为难以理解或几乎难以理解。有人提出早期干预可以减轻CP±L对语音发展的影响。然而,目前,针对CP±L儿童早期干预的证据有限,大多数研究集中在3岁及以上的儿童。本文对现有知识的补充:本文回顾了为CP±L患儿提供的不同类型早期语音干预及其是否有效支持语音发展的证据。在本评价中,早期干预定义为在儿童生命的前3年提供的干预。本评价描述了干预方法及其针对该人群的实施方式。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?在英国,患有CP±L的儿童及其家庭在20年的时间里得到国民健康服务(NHS)的支持,言语和语言治疗课程可能会持续数周或数月。如果在生命的前3年提供早期干预是有效的,那么有可能改善幼儿期的语音结果,并减轻儿童、家庭和服务机构的护理负担。本评价考虑了CP±L儿童在生命的前3年进行早期语音干预的证据,并确定了未来研究的领域。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验