• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌酐清除率与 I 期临床试验中分子靶向药物的毒性有关。

Creatinine clearance is associated with toxicity from molecularly targeted agents in phase I trials.

机构信息

Drug Development Unit, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

出版信息

Oncology. 2012;83(4):177-82. doi: 10.1159/000341152. Epub 2012 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1159/000341152
PMID:22889980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5079100/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate any correlations between baseline creatinine clearance and the development of grade 3/4 toxicities during treatment within oncology phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents where entry criteria mandate a serum creatinine of ≤ 1.5 × the upper limit of normal.

METHODS

Documented toxicity and creatinine clearance (calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula) from all patients treated with molecularly targeted agents in the context of phase I trials within our centre over a 5-year period were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from 722 patients were analyzed; 116 (16%) developed at least one episode of grade 3/4 toxicity. Patients who developed a late-onset (>1 cycle) grade 3/4 toxicity had a lower creatinine clearance than those who did not (82.69 ml/min vs. 98.97 ml/min; p = < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Creatinine clearance (even when within normal limits) should be studied as a potential factor influencing late toxicities in the clinical trials of molecularly targeted anti-cancer drugs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估分子靶向药物 I 期临床试验中,入组标准规定血清肌酐≤1.5 倍正常值上限时,基线肌酐清除率与治疗期间发生 3/4 级毒性之间的相关性。

方法

分析了本中心 5 年内 I 期试验中接受分子靶向药物治疗的所有患者的毒性和肌酐清除率(用 Cockcroft-Gault 公式计算)的记录数据。

结果

共分析了 722 例患者的数据,其中 116 例(16%)发生了至少一次 3/4 级毒性。发生迟发性(>1 个周期)3/4 级毒性的患者肌酐清除率低于未发生毒性的患者(82.69ml/min 比 98.97ml/min;p<0.001)。

结论

即使在正常值范围内,也应研究肌酐清除率(creatinine clearance)作为影响分子靶向抗癌药物临床试验中迟发性毒性的潜在因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78e/5079100/34d46640b2e3/ocl-0083-0177-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78e/5079100/118d4a0609ed/ocl-0083-0177-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78e/5079100/34d46640b2e3/ocl-0083-0177-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78e/5079100/118d4a0609ed/ocl-0083-0177-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78e/5079100/34d46640b2e3/ocl-0083-0177-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Creatinine clearance is associated with toxicity from molecularly targeted agents in phase I trials.肌酐清除率与 I 期临床试验中分子靶向药物的毒性有关。
Oncology. 2012;83(4):177-82. doi: 10.1159/000341152. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
2
Serum cystatin C concentration compared with other markers of glomerular filtration rate in the old old.高龄老人血清胱抑素C浓度与肾小球滤过率其他标志物的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jul;50(7):1278-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50317.x.
3
Defining the risk of toxicity in phase I oncology trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: a single centre experience.定义新型分子靶向药物 I 期肿瘤临床试验的毒性风险:单中心经验。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1968-1973. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds030. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
4
Effect of creatinine clearance on patterns of toxicity in older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.肌酐清除率对老年乳腺癌辅助化疗患者毒性模式的影响。
Drugs Aging. 2005;22(9):785-91. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522090-00007.
5
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated from serum creatinine predicts total (urine and peritoneal) creatinine clearance in patients on peritoneal dialysis.血清肌酐估计的肾小球滤过率(GFR)可预测腹膜透析患者的总(尿和腹膜)肌酐清除率。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2010 Dec;42(4):1085-92. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9715-x. Epub 2010 Apr 4.
6
Chromium-51 ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid glomerular filtration rate: a better predictor than glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula for renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.铬-51 乙二胺四乙酸肾小球滤过率:对于系统性红斑狼疮患者肾脏受累情况,它是比用 Cockcroft-Gault 公式计算的肾小球滤过率更好的预测指标。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Mar;40(3):324-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.3.324.
7
[Comparison of methods for evaluating renal function (Data of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital in 2006)].[肾功能评估方法的比较(考纳斯医科大学医院2006年数据)]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43 Suppl 1:46-51.
8
Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?分子靶向药物的 I 期临床试验:我们是否应该更加关注迟发性毒性?
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1728-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9236. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
9
Performance of creatinine clearance equations on the original Cockcroft-Gault population.基于原始Cockcroft-Gault人群的肌酐清除率方程的性能。
Clin Nephrol. 2006 Aug;66(2):89-97. doi: 10.5414/cnp66089.
10
Validity of rapid estimation of glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetic patients with normal renal function.肾功能正常的2型糖尿病患者肾小球滤过率快速估算的有效性
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999 Mar;14(3):615-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.3.615.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining the risk of toxicity in phase I oncology trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: a single centre experience.定义新型分子靶向药物 I 期肿瘤临床试验的毒性风险:单中心经验。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1968-1973. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds030. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
2
Safety and efficacy of molecularly targeted agents in patients with metastatic kidney cancer with renal dysfunction.分子靶向药物在肾功能障碍的转移性肾细胞癌患者中的安全性和疗效。
Anticancer Drugs. 2011 Sep;22(8):794-800. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328346af0d.
3
Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?
分子靶向药物的 I 期临床试验:我们是否应该更加关注迟发性毒性?
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1728-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9236. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
4
Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.I期癌症临床试验中的剂量递增方法。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.
5
90-Days mortality rate in patients treated within the context of a phase-I trial: how should we identify patients who should not go on trial?I期试验背景下接受治疗患者的90天死亡率:我们应如何识别不适合参加试验的患者?
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jul;44(11):1536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
6
Nomograms to predict serious adverse events in phase II clinical trials of molecularly targeted agents.用于预测分子靶向药物II期临床试验中严重不良事件的列线图。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1324-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0673.
7
Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate in patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of renal dysfunction: a study by the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group.甲磺酸伊马替尼在晚期恶性肿瘤及不同程度肾功能不全患者中的Ⅰ期和药代动力学研究:美国国立癌症研究所器官功能障碍工作组的一项研究
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):570-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.3819.
8
Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.1991年至2002年期间1期肿瘤学试验的风险与益处
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):895-904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042220.
9
Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials.癌症患者参与1期临床试验的风险与获益趋势。
JAMA. 2004 Nov 3;292(17):2130-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.17.2130.
10
Comparison of prognostic factors in patients in phase I trials of cytotoxic drugs vs new noncytotoxic agents.细胞毒性药物与新型非细胞毒性药物Ⅰ期试验患者预后因素的比较。
Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1166-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601218.