Suppr超能文献

问卷与电话随访在外科患者出院后并发症检测中的比较:随机临床试验。

Questionnaire versus telephone follow-up to detect postdischarge complications in surgical patients: randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, H1-213, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2576-83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1740-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postdischarge complications in surgical patients are usually recorded only when readmission is required, a method that likely underestimates the overall complication rate. Our aim was to determine which method-telephone interview or questionnaire by mail-collects the most postdischarge complications.

METHODS

We performed a randomized clinical equivalence trial. From December 2008 until August 2009, all adult surgical patients admitted to a university hospital were randomized to be approached by mail or by phone 30 days after discharge to collect information about postdischarge complications. Primary outcome was the total number of reported complications after discharge. Secondary outcome was the severity of the complications.

RESULTS

In all, 1595 patients were reached: 890 by means of a telephone interview and 705 through a questionnaire. Response rate was higher in the telephone group than in the questionnaire group (63.8 % vs. 51.3 %). The percentage of patients reporting one or more complications did not differ significantly between the groups: 43.3 % in the telephone group versus 39.6 % in the questionnaire group. Length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, and type of surgery-but not the survey techniques compared here-significantly influenced the number of complications reported. The percentage of patient-reported complications requiring treatment did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The two survey methods did not differ in their ability to appreciate postdischarge complications as reported by the patients. The decision to use either method may be determined by the institution, costs involved, and labor requirement.

摘要

背景

外科患者的出院后并发症通常只有在需要再次入院时才会被记录,这种方法可能低估了整体并发症发生率。我们的目的是确定哪种方法——电话访谈还是邮寄问卷——能收集到最多的出院后并发症。

方法

我们进行了一项随机临床等效性试验。从 2008 年 12 月至 2009 年 8 月,所有入住大学医院的成年外科患者被随机分为通过邮寄或电话在出院后 30 天收集有关出院后并发症的信息。主要结局是出院后报告的总并发症数。次要结局是并发症的严重程度。

结果

共联系了 1595 名患者:890 名通过电话访谈,705 名通过问卷。电话组的应答率高于问卷组(63.8%比 51.3%)。报告一个或多个并发症的患者比例在两组之间无显著差异:电话组为 43.3%,问卷组为 39.6%。住院时间、美国麻醉医师协会分级和手术类型——而不是这里比较的调查技术——显著影响报告的并发症数量。需要治疗的患者报告的并发症比例在两组之间无显著差异。

结论

两种调查方法在患者报告的出院后并发症方面的能力没有差异。选择使用哪种方法可能取决于机构、涉及的成本和劳动力需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验