• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响有症状心包积液患者手术干预后生存率的危险因素。

Risk factors affecting the survival rate in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion undergoing surgical intervention.

作者信息

Mirhosseini Seyed Mohsen, Fakhri Mohammad, Mozaffary Amirhossein, Lotfaliany Mojtaba, Behzadnia Neda, Ansari Aval Zahra, Ghiasi Seyed Mohammad Saeed, Boloursaz Mohammad Reza, Masjedi Mohammad Reza

机构信息

Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;16(4):495-500. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs491. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivs491
PMID:23250960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3598022/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The optimal management and treatment of pericardial effusion are still controversial. There is limited data related to the risk factors affecting survival in these patients. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors affecting the survival rate of patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion who underwent surgical interventions.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2011, we retrospectively analysed 153 patients who underwent subxiphoid pericardial window as their surgical intervention to drain pericardial effusions at the National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung diseases (NRITLD). To determine the effects of risk factors on survival rate, demographic data, clinical records, echocardiographic data, computed tomographic and cytopathological findings and also operative information of patients were recorded. Patients were followed annually until the last clinical follow-up (August 2011). To determine the prognostic factors affecting survival, both univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were utilized.

RESULTS

There were 89 men and 64 women with a mean age of 50.3 ± 15.5 years. The most prevalent symptom was dyspnoea. Concurrent malignancies were present in 66 patients. Lungs were the most prevalent primary site for malignancy. The median duration of follow-up was 15 (range 1-85 months). Six-month, 1-year and 18-month survival rates were 85.6, 61.4 and 36.6%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, positive history of lung cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 2.894, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.362-6.147, P = 0.006) or other organ cancers (HR 2.315, 95% CI 1.009-50311, P = 0.048), presence of a mass in the computed tomography (HR 1.985, 95% CI 1.100-3.581, P = 0.023), and echocardiographic findings compatible with tamponade (HR 1.745, 95% CI 1.048-2.90 P = 0.032) were the three independent predictors of postoperative death.

CONCLUSIONS

In the surgical management of pericardial effusion, patients with underlying malignant disease, especially with lung cancer, patients with a detectable invasion of thorax in computed tomography and those with positive echocardiographic findings compatible with tamponade have a poor survival. Therefore, minimally invasive therapies could be considered as a more acceptable alternative for these high-risk patients.

摘要

目的

心包积液的最佳管理和治疗仍存在争议。关于影响这些患者生存的危险因素的数据有限。本研究的目的是确定影响接受手术干预的有症状心包积液患者生存率的危险因素。

方法

2004年至2011年,我们回顾性分析了153例在国家结核病和肺部疾病研究所(NRITLD)接受剑突下心包开窗术作为心包积液引流手术干预的患者。为了确定危险因素对生存率的影响,记录了患者的人口统计学数据、临床记录、超声心动图数据、计算机断层扫描和细胞病理学检查结果以及手术信息。对患者进行每年一次的随访,直至最后一次临床随访(2011年8月)。为了确定影响生存的预后因素,采用了单因素分析和多因素Cox比例风险模型。

结果

有89名男性和64名女性,平均年龄为50.3±15.5岁。最常见的症状是呼吸困难。66例患者同时患有恶性肿瘤。肺部是最常见的恶性肿瘤原发部位。中位随访时间为15个月(范围1 - 85个月)。6个月、1年和18个月的生存率分别为85.6%、61.4%和36.6%。在多因素分析中,肺癌阳性病史(风险比[HR]2.894,95%置信区间[CI]1.362 - 6.147,P = 0.006)或其他器官癌症(HR 2.315,95% CI 1.009 - 50311,P = 0.048)、计算机断层扫描显示有肿块(HR 1.985,95% CI 1.100 - 3.581,P = 0.023)以及与心包填塞相符的超声心动图表现(HR 1.745,95% CI 1.048 - 2.90,P = 0.032)是术后死亡的三个独立预测因素。

结论

在心包积液的手术治疗中,患有潜在恶性疾病的患者,尤其是肺癌患者、计算机断层扫描显示有胸部可检测到的侵犯的患者以及超声心动图表现与心包填塞相符的患者生存率较差。因此,对于这些高危患者,微创治疗可被视为更可接受的替代方案。

相似文献

1
Risk factors affecting the survival rate in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion undergoing surgical intervention.影响有症状心包积液患者手术干预后生存率的危险因素。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;16(4):495-500. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs491. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
2
Risk factors affecting the survival of patients with pericardial effusion submitted to subxiphoid pericardiostomy.影响接受剑突下心包造口术的心包积液患者生存的危险因素。
Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):242-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.242.
3
Mid-Term Efficacy of Subxiphoid Versus Transpleural Pericardial Window for Pericardial Effusion.剑突下与经胸膜心包开窗术治疗心包积液的中期疗效
J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Systemic chemotherapy in combination with pericardial window has better outcomes in malignant pericardial effusions.全身化疗联合心包开窗术治疗恶性心包积液疗效更佳。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):2288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.04.031. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
5
Pericardial effusions in the cancer population: prognostic factors after pericardial window and the impact of paradoxical hemodynamic instability.癌症患者的心包积液:心包开窗术后的预后因素及矛盾性血流动力学不稳定的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
6
Prognostic factors affecting survival of patients with cancer-related pericardial effusion managed by surgery.影响接受手术治疗的癌症相关性心包积液患者生存的预后因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug 5;12:249. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-249.
7
Surgical properties and survival of a pericardial window via left minithoracotomy for benign and malignant pericardial tamponade in cancer patients.经左小开胸术行心包开窗术治疗癌症患者良性和恶性心包填塞的手术特性和生存。
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun 28;10:123. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-123.
8
Severe pericardial effusion in patients with concurrent malignancy: a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors influencing survival.合并恶性肿瘤患者的严重心包积液:影响生存的预后因素的回顾性分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;15(11):3268-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0059-z. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
9
The efficiency of surgical subxiphoid pericardial drainage and percutaneous pericardial drainage in pericardial effusions associated with cardiac tamponade.剑突下心包切开引流术与经皮心包引流术治疗心脏压塞相关性心包积液的疗效比较
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013 Mar-Apr;108(2):226-33.
10
Surgical management of pericardial effusion in patients with malignancies. Comparison of subxiphoid window versus pericardiectomy.恶性肿瘤患者心包积液的外科治疗。剑突下开窗术与心包切除术的比较。
Cancer. 1991 Jan 1;67(1):76-80. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910101)67:1<76::aid-cncr2820670115>3.0.co;2-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Analysis of Digital Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Pathologic Features in Pure Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast (PIMPC).乳腺纯浸润性微乳头状癌(PIMPC)中数字乳腺摄影、超声检查与病理特征的相关性分析
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024 Apr 25;16:245-252. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S454065. eCollection 2024.
2
The Association of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches and Mortality in Patients with Malignant Pleuropericarditis-A 10 Year Retrospective Observational Study.微创外科手术方法与恶性胸膜心包炎患者死亡率的关联:一项回顾性观察研究,时间跨度为 10 年。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 27;58(6):718. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060718.
3
Pericardial Effusion during Proton Therapy in a Patient with Chemorefractory Hodgkin Lymphoma.化学难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤患者质子治疗期间的心包积液
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Oct 18;8(4):76-81. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-21-00010. eCollection 2022 Spring.
4
The Value of Cytology in the Evaluation of Malignant Pericardial Effusions: A Systematic Review.细胞学检查在恶性心包积液评估中的价值:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 1;12(2):367. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020367.
5
Pericardial Effusions in Patients With Cancer: Anesthetic Management and Survival Outcomes.癌症患者的心包积液:麻醉管理和生存结果。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Feb;35(2):571-577. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.049. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Application of Microwave Ablation for Treating Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.微波消融治疗肺腺癌的应用:一例报告
Tanaffos. 2017 Jun;16(4):304-308.
7
eComment. Minimally invasive techniques for malignant pericardial effusions.电子评论。恶性心包积液的微创技术。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;16(4):500. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt009.
8
eComment. Surgical or percutaneous pericardiocentesis in symptomatic pericardial effusion.电子评论。有症状心包积液的外科或经皮心包穿刺术。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;16(4):500. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs577.

本文引用的文献

1
Questionnaire versus telephone follow-up to detect postdischarge complications in surgical patients: randomized clinical trial.问卷与电话随访在外科患者出院后并发症检测中的比较:随机临床试验。
World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2576-83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1740-8.
2
Pericardial effusions in the cancer population: prognostic factors after pericardial window and the impact of paradoxical hemodynamic instability.癌症患者的心包积液:心包开窗术后的预后因素及矛盾性血流动力学不稳定的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
3
Severe pericardial effusion in patients with concurrent malignancy: a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors influencing survival.合并恶性肿瘤患者的严重心包积液:影响生存的预后因素的回顾性分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;15(11):3268-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0059-z. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
4
Prognostic factors in the surgical management of pericardial effusion in the patient with concurrent malignancy.合并恶性肿瘤患者心包积液外科治疗的预后因素
Chest. 2004 Apr;125(4):1328-34. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1328.
5
Secondary malignant tumors of the pericardium.心包继发性恶性肿瘤。
Circulation. 1962 Aug;26:228-41. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.26.2.228.
6
Incidence and clinical manifestations of cardiac metastases.心脏转移瘤的发病率及临床表现。
J Am Med Assoc. 1953 Oct 24;153(8):712-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.1953.02940250018005.
7
Acute cardiac tamponade.急性心脏压塞
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 14;349(7):684-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra022643.
8
Risk factors affecting the survival of patients with pericardial effusion submitted to subxiphoid pericardiostomy.影响接受剑突下心包造口术的心包积液患者生存的危险因素。
Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):242-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.242.
9
Technical and prognostic outcomes of double-balloon pericardiotomy for large malignancy-related pericardial effusions.大型恶性肿瘤相关性心包积液的双球囊心包切开术的技术及预后结果
Chest. 2002 Sep;122(3):893-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.3.893.
10
Clinical clues to the causes of large pericardial effusions.大量心包积液病因的临床线索
Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00459-9.