Suppr超能文献

二甲双胍而非格列美脲可改善 2 型糖尿病患者颈动脉直径和血流。

Metformin, but not glimepiride, improves carotid artery diameter and blood flow in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM-18), São Paulo/SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jul;67(7):711-7. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)03.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of glimepiride and metformin on vascular reactivity, hemostatic factors and glucose and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in 16 uncontrolled patients with diabetes previously treated with dietary intervention. The participants were randomized into metformin or glimepiride therapy groups. After four months, the patients were crossed over with no washout period to the alternative treatment for an additional four-month period on similar dosage schedules. The following variables were assessed before and after four months of each treatment: 1) fasting glycemia, insulin, catecholamines, lipid profiles and HbA1 levels; 2) t-PA and PAI-1 (antigen and activity), platelet aggregation and fibrinogen and plasminogen levels; and 3) the flow indices of the carotid and brachial arteries. In addition, at the end of each period, a 12-hour metabolic profile was obtained after fasting and every 2 hours thereafter.

RESULTS

Both therapies resulted in similar decreases in fasting glucose, triglyceride and norepinephrine levels, and they increased the fibrinolytic factor plasminogen but decreased t-PA activity. Metformin caused lower insulin and pro-insulin levels and higher glucagon levels and increased systolic carotid diameter and blood flow. Neither metformin nor glimepiride affected endothelial-dependent or endothelial-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Glimepiride and metformin were effective in improving glucose and lipid profiles and norepinephrine levels. Metformin afforded more protection against macrovascular diabetes complications, increased systolic carotid artery diameter and total and systolic blood flow, and decreased insulin levels. As both therapies increased plasminogen levels but reduced t-PA activity, a coagulation process was likely still ongoing.

摘要

目的

比较格列美脲和二甲双胍对 2 型糖尿病患者血管反应性、止血因子以及血糖和血脂谱的影响。

方法

对 16 例未经控制的糖尿病患者进行了前瞻性研究,这些患者此前曾接受过饮食干预。将参与者随机分为二甲双胍或格列美脲治疗组。四个月后,患者在没有洗脱期的情况下交叉使用另一种治疗方案,同样的剂量方案再进行四个月的治疗。在每个治疗方案的四个月前后评估以下变量:1)空腹血糖、胰岛素、儿茶酚胺、血脂谱和 HbA1 水平;2)t-PA 和 PAI-1(抗原和活性)、血小板聚集和纤维蛋白原及纤溶酶原水平;3)颈动脉和肱动脉的血流指数。此外,在每个周期结束时,在禁食后获得 12 小时代谢谱,并在随后的每 2 小时获得一次。

结果

两种治疗方法均导致空腹血糖、甘油三酯和去甲肾上腺素水平相似下降,增加了纤维蛋白溶解因子纤溶酶原,但降低了 t-PA 活性。二甲双胍导致胰岛素和前胰岛素水平降低,胰高血糖素水平升高,并增加了颈总动脉直径和血流量。二甲双胍和格列美脲均未影响肱动脉内皮依赖性或内皮非依赖性血管舒张。

结论

格列美脲和二甲双胍均可有效改善血糖和血脂谱以及去甲肾上腺素水平。二甲双胍能更好地预防大血管糖尿病并发症,增加颈总动脉直径和总血流量及收缩压,降低胰岛素水平。由于两种治疗方法均增加了纤溶酶原水平,但降低了 t-PA 活性,因此凝血过程可能仍在继续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f839/3400159/f9431d060e0d/cln-67-07-711-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验