• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当他们相信奇迹时。

When they believe in miracles.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):582-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100677. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2012-100677
PMID:22893530
Abstract

Brierley et al argue that in cases where it is medically futile to continue providing life-sustaining therapies to children in intensive care, medical professionals should be allowed to withdraw such therapies, even when the parents of these children believe that there is a chance of a miracle cure taking place. In reasoning this way, Brierley et al appear to implicitly assume that miracle cures will never take place, but they do not justify this assumption and it would be very difficult for them to do so. Instead of seeking to override the wishes of parents, who are waiting for a miracle, it is suggested that a better response may be to seek to engage devout parents on their own terms, and encourage them to think about whether or not continuing life-sustaining therapies will make it more likely that a miracle cure will occur.

摘要

布赖尔利等人认为,在医学上继续为重症监护中的儿童提供维持生命的治疗已无意义的情况下,医务人员应该被允许停止这些治疗,即使这些儿童的父母认为出现奇迹治愈的可能性。布赖尔利等人这样推理,似乎隐含地假设奇迹治愈永远不会发生,但他们没有证明这一假设,而且他们很难做到这一点。与其试图推翻那些正在等待奇迹的父母的意愿,不如建议更好的回应方式可能是设法以父母自己的方式与虔诚的父母接触,并鼓励他们思考继续维持生命的治疗是否更有可能出现奇迹治愈。

相似文献

1
When they believe in miracles.当他们相信奇迹时。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):582-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100677. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
2
Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?是否应该允许宗教信仰阻碍世俗方法在儿童中停止和拒绝治疗?
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):573-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100104. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
3
Cultural sensitivity in paediatrics.儿科的文化敏感性。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):579-81. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100716. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
4
Religious red herrings.宗教上的转移注意力的话题。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):585-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100676. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
5
If you ask the wrong question, you'll get the wrong answer.
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):578. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100682. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
6
[Epidemiology and evaluation of withdrawing and withholding of treatment procedure in a pediatric intensive care unit].[儿科重症监护病房中治疗措施撤除与 withhold 的流行病学及评估] (注:这里“withhold”在医学语境中可能较难准确对应中文词汇,大概意思是“ withhold treatment”有“暂缓治疗”等含义,整体翻译可能稍显生硬,具体需结合上下文进一步优化表述,但按要求不能添加解释说明)
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Dec;31(12):937-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
7
[Withholding or withdrawing life saving treatment in pediatric intensive care unit: GFRUP guidelines].[儿科重症监护病房中生命支持治疗的 withholding 或撤除:GFRUP 指南] 注:“withholding”在这里直接翻译为“ withholding”,在医学语境中可能有特定含义,比如“ withholding treatment”常指“ withhold 某种治疗(不给予、停止使用等)” ,具体准确含义需结合更详细的医学背景确定。这里按要求直接保留英文未进一步意译。
Arch Pediatr. 2005 Oct;12(10):1501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2005.04.085. Epub 2005 Jun 2.
8
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
9
Ethical problems in pediatric critical care: consent.儿科重症监护中的伦理问题:同意
Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5 Suppl):S407-10. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065274.46402.DB.
10
Attitudes to end-of-life decisions in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中对临终决策的态度。
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Jan;16(1):83-92. doi: 10.1177/0969733008097994.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing a Patient's Hope for a Miracle.解决患者对奇迹的期望。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):535-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
AMEN in challenging conversations: bridging the gaps between faith, hope, and medicine.在具有挑战性的对话中践行阿们:弥合信仰、希望与医学之间的差距。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jul;10(4):e191-5. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001375. Epub 2014 May 6.