Newland Richard F, Baker Robert A, Sanderson Andrew J, Tuble Sigrid C, Tully Phil J
Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012 Jun;44(2):53-9.
This report describes the assessment of three specific safety-related specifications in the consideration of an alternate oxygenator; first the grip strength relationship between various oxygenator connectors and SMARxT tubing, second, the grip strength of various biopassive tubings and an isolated SMARxT connector, and finally, the accuracy of the arterial outlet temperature measurement. Grip strength experiments for the connections between the SMARxT tubing and the venous reservoir outlet and the oxygenator venous inlet and oxygenator arterial outlet of the Medtronic Affinity, Sorin Synthesis, Sorin Primox, and Terumo Capiox RX25 oxygenators were performed. In addition we compared the grip strength of polyvinyl chloride, Physio, Trillium, Carmeda, X-Coating, and SMARxT tubing. The accuracy of the integrated arterial outlet temperature probes was determined by comparing the temperatures measured by the integrated probe with a precision reference thermometer. Connector grip strength comparisons for the evaluation oxygenators with SMARxT tubing showed significant variation between oxygenators and connections (p = .02). Evaluation of the arterial outlet showed significant variation between evaluation oxygenators, while at the venous reservoir outlet and oxygenator inlet, there were no significant differences. Grip strength comparison data for the various tubing types demonstrated a main effect for tubing type F(5, 18) = 8.01, p = .002, eta(p)(2) = .77. Temperature accuracy measurements demonstrated that all oxygenators overread the arterial outlet temperature at 15 degrees C, whilst at temperatures > or = 25 degrees C, all oxygenators underread the arterial outlet temperature. The integrity of SMARxT tubing connection is influenced by the connector type, and may decline over time, highlighting the importance to not consider interchanging components of the bypass circuit as inconsequential.
本报告描述了在考虑使用替代氧合器时对三项与安全相关的特定规格的评估;首先是各种氧合器连接器与SMARxT管路之间的握持强度关系,其次是各种生物惰性管路和单独的SMARxT连接器的握持强度,最后是动脉出口温度测量的准确性。对美敦力Affinity、索林Synthesis、索林Primox和泰尔茂Capiox RX25氧合器的SMARxT管路与静脉储液器出口、氧合器静脉入口和氧合器动脉出口之间的连接进行了握持强度实验。此外,我们比较了聚氯乙烯、Physio、Trillium、Carmeda、X-Coating和SMARxT管路的握持强度。通过将集成探头测量的温度与精密参考温度计测量的温度进行比较,确定了集成动脉出口温度探头的准确性。使用SMARxT管路对评估氧合器进行的连接器握持强度比较显示,氧合器和连接之间存在显著差异(p = .02)。动脉出口的评估显示,评估氧合器之间存在显著差异,而在静脉储液器出口和氧合器入口处,没有显著差异。各种管路类型的握持强度比较数据显示,管路类型有主要影响F(5, 18) = 8.01,p = .002,eta(p)(2) = .77。温度准确性测量表明,所有氧合器在15摄氏度时均高估了动脉出口温度,而在温度≥25摄氏度时,所有氧合器均低估了动脉出口温度。SMARxT管路连接的完整性受连接器类型影响,且可能随时间下降,这突出了不应将旁路回路组件的互换视为无关紧要的重要性。