• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康差异与医疗保健融资:重塑美国医疗保健系统。

Health disparities and health care financing: restructuring the American health care system.

作者信息

Diggs Schnequa N

机构信息

Florida Atlantic University, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 2012 Summer;38(4):76-90.

PMID:22894023
Abstract

For more than seven decades there has been a systematic disregard for the health needs of certain groups of individuals. Discrepancies in treatment and privilege based on race/ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, class, and socio-economic status have been significant players in any portrait of American health care and have helped frame considerations of those who deserve and those undeserving of quality health care. Continuous incidences of inequitable health care practices strongly suggest a need for drastic changes in our current health care system. Although growing interest in social inequalities in health preside, health policy makers struggle to find appropriate intervention strategies to alleviate health disparities. The purpose of this article is to depict a clearer portrait of the American health care system within the context of health disparities and recognize intervention strategies to reduce/eliminate health care disparities. This article concludes with suggestions on how to refinance the American health care system based on equality principles.

摘要

七十多年来,某些群体的健康需求一直被系统地忽视。基于种族/族裔、性别、性取向、阶级和社会经济地位的治疗差异和特权差异,在美国医疗保健的任何描述中都扮演着重要角色,并影响了人们对哪些人应得高质量医疗保健、哪些人不应得的考量。不公平医疗保健行为的持续发生,强烈表明我们当前的医疗保健系统需要进行彻底变革。尽管人们对健康方面的社会不平等问题的兴趣与日俱增,但卫生政策制定者仍在努力寻找适当的干预策略来缓解健康差距。本文的目的是在健康差距的背景下,更清晰地描绘美国医疗保健系统,并认识到减少/消除医疗保健差距的干预策略。本文最后就如何基于平等原则为美国医疗保健系统重新融资提出了建议。

相似文献

1
Health disparities and health care financing: restructuring the American health care system.健康差异与医疗保健融资:重塑美国医疗保健系统。
J Health Care Finance. 2012 Summer;38(4):76-90.
2
Is inequity undermining Australia's 'universal' health care system? Socio-economic inequalities in the use of specialist medical and non-medical ambulatory health care.不平等是否正在破坏澳大利亚的“全民”医疗保健系统?专科医疗和非医疗门诊医疗保健利用方面的社会经济不平等。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009 Oct;33(5):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00430.x.
3
The economic burden shouldered by public and private entities as a consequence of health disparities between men and women.由于男女健康差距而给公共和私营实体带来的经济负担。
Am J Mens Health. 2011 Nov;5(6):528-39. doi: 10.1177/1557988311421214.
4
Cultural competence in the era of evidence-based practice.循证实践时代的文化能力。
J Prof Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;24(3):172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.10.012.
5
Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey.美国和加拿大的医疗服务可及性、健康状况及健康差距:一项基于全国人口调查的结果
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1300-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059402. Epub 2006 May 30.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Restructuring American health care financing: first of all, do no harm!重塑美国医疗保健融资:首先,不要造成伤害!
Hepatology. 1993 Jul;18(1):206-15.
8
Equity in Irish health care financing: measurement issues.爱尔兰医疗保健融资中的公平性:衡量问题。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Apr;5(2):149-69. doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990168. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
9
The equity impact of the universal coverage policy: lessons from Thailand.全民覆盖政策的公平性影响:来自泰国的经验教训。
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2009;21:57-81.
10
Getting past denial--the high cost of health care in the United States.突破否认——美国医疗保健的高昂成本。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 24;361(13):1227-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0907172. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Health Equity: Cancer Care Outcome Disparities in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries.全球健康公平性:高、中、低收入国家的癌症治疗结果差异
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 1;34(1):6-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.2860. Epub 2015 Nov 17.