Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, XueYuan west Road 109, Wenzhou 325027, China.
J Biomed Opt. 2012 Jul;17(7):075005. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.075005.
We propose a method of calculating the corneal asphericity (Q) and analyze the characteristics of the anterior corneal shape using the tangential radius. Fifty-eight right eyes of 58 subjects were evaluated using the Orbscan II corneal topographer. The Q-values of the flat principal semi-meridians calculated by the sagittal radius were compared to those by the tangential radius. Variation in the Q-value with semi-meridian in the nasal and temporal cornea calculated by the tangential radius was analyzed. There were significant differences in Q-values (P<0.001) between the two methods. The mean Q-values of the flat principal semi-meridians calculated by tangential radius with -0.33 ± 0.10 in the nasal and -0.22 ± 0.12 in the temporal showed more negative than the corresponding Q-values calculated by the sagittal radius. The Q-values calculated by tangential radius became less negative gradually from horizontal semi-meridians to oblique semi-meridians in both nasal and temporal cornea. Variation in Q-value with semi-meridian was more obvious in the nasal cornea. The method of calculating corneal Q using the tangential radius could provide more reasonable and complete Q-value than that by the sagittal radius. The model of a whole anterior corneal surface could be reconstructed on the basis of the above method.
我们提出了一种计算角膜非球面性(Q)的方法,并使用切线半径分析了角膜前表面形状的特征。使用 Orbscan II 角膜地形图仪评估了 58 名受检者的 58 只右眼。通过矢状半径计算的扁平主子午线的 Q 值与通过切线半径计算的 Q 值进行了比较。分析了通过切线半径计算的鼻侧和颞侧角膜子午线 Q 值的变化。两种方法的 Q 值存在显著差异(P<0.001)。通过切线半径计算的扁平主子午线的平均 Q 值在鼻侧为-0.33 ± 0.10,在颞侧为-0.22 ± 0.12,均比通过矢状半径计算的相应 Q 值更负。在鼻侧和颞侧,通过切线半径计算的 Q 值从水平子午线到斜子午线逐渐变得不那么负。Q 值随子午线的变化在鼻侧更为明显。使用切线半径计算角膜 Q 的方法比使用矢状半径提供了更合理和完整的 Q 值。在此基础上可以重建整个角膜前表面的模型。