Suppr超能文献

用于门诊环境中儿童和成人急性咳嗽的非处方(OTC)药物。

Over-the-counter (OTC) medications for acute cough in children and adults in ambulatory settings.

作者信息

Smith Susan M, Schroeder Knut, Fahey Tom

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD001831. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001831.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute cough due to upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a common symptom. Non-prescription, over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are frequently recommended as a first-line treatment, but there is little evidence as to whether these drugs are effective.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of oral OTC cough preparations for acute cough in children and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2012 Issue 3 which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to March week 1 2012), EMBASE (January 1974 to March 2012), CINAHL (January 2010 to March 2012), LILACS (January 2010 to March 2012), Web of Science (January 2010 to March 2012) and the UK Department of Health National Research Register (March 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral OTC cough preparations with placebo in children and adults suffering from acute cough in ambulatory settings. We considered all cough outcomes and secondary outcomes of interest were adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened potentially relevant citations, extracted data and assessed study quality. We performed quantitative analysis where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-six trials (18 in adults, eight in children) involving 4037 people (3421 adults and 616 children) were included.In the adult studies six trials compared antitussives with placebo and had variable results. Two trials compared the expectorant guaifenesin with placebo; one indicated significant benefit whereas the other did not. One trial found that a mucolytic reduced cough frequency and symptom scores. Two studies examined antihistamine-decongestant combinations and found conflicting results. Four studies compared other combinations of drugs with placebo and indicated some benefit in reducing cough symptoms. Three trials found antihistamines were no more effective than placebo in relieving cough symptoms.In the children studies antitussives (two studies), antihistamines (two studies), antihistamine decongestants (two studies) and antitussive/bronchodilator combinations (one study) were no more effective than placebo. No studies using expectorants met our inclusion criteria. The results of one trial favoured active treatment with mucolytics over placebo. One trial tested two paediatric cough syrups and both preparations showed a 'satisfactory response' in 46% and 56% of children compared to 21% of children in the placebo group.A minority of studies reported adverse effects and described a low incidence of mainly minor side effects such as nausea, vomiting, headache and drowsiness.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no good evidence for or against the effectiveness of OTC medicines in acute cough. The results of this review have to be interpreted with caution due to differences in study characteristics and quality. Studies often showed conflicting results with uncertainty regarding clinical relevance. Higher quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of self care treatments for acute cough.

摘要

背景

上呼吸道感染(URTI)引起的急性咳嗽是一种常见症状。非处方的非处方药(OTC)常被推荐作为一线治疗药物,但几乎没有证据表明这些药物是否有效。

目的

评估口服非处方止咳制剂对儿童和成人急性咳嗽的疗效。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)2012年第3期,其中包含急性呼吸道感染组的专业注册库、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2012年3月第1周)、EMBASE(1974年1月至2012年3月)、CINAHL(2010年1月至2012年3月)、LILACS(2010年1月至2012年3月)、科学引文索引(2010年1月至2012年3月)以及英国卫生部国家研究注册库(2010年3月)。

选择标准

在门诊环境中,比较口服非处方止咳制剂与安慰剂对患有急性咳嗽的儿童和成人疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们考虑了所有咳嗽相关结局,感兴趣的次要结局为不良反应。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立筛选潜在相关文献,提取数据并评估研究质量。我们在适当情况下进行了定量分析。

主要结果

纳入了26项试验(18项针对成人,8项针对儿童),涉及4037人(3421名成人和616名儿童)。在成人研究中,6项试验比较了镇咳药与安慰剂,结果各异。2项试验比较了祛痰剂愈创甘油醚与安慰剂;一项显示有显著益处,而另一项则没有。一项试验发现一种黏液溶解剂可降低咳嗽频率和症状评分。2项研究检验了抗组胺药 - 减充血剂组合,结果相互矛盾。4项研究比较了其他药物组合与安慰剂,表明在减轻咳嗽症状方面有一定益处。3项试验发现抗组胺药在缓解咳嗽症状方面并不比安慰剂更有效。在儿童研究中,镇咳药(2项研究)、抗组胺药(2项研究)、抗组胺 - 减充血剂(2项研究)和镇咳药/支气管扩张剂组合(1项研究)并不比安慰剂更有效。没有使用祛痰剂的研究符合我们的纳入标准。一项试验的结果表明,与安慰剂相比,使用黏液溶解剂进行积极治疗更有利。一项试验测试了两种儿科止咳糖浆,与安慰剂组21%的儿童相比,两种制剂在46%和56%的儿童中显示出“满意的反应”。少数研究报告了不良反应,且主要描述的是低发生率的轻微副作用,如恶心、呕吐、头痛和嗜睡。

作者结论

没有充分证据支持或反对非处方药物对急性咳嗽的有效性。由于研究特征和质量的差异,本综述的结果必须谨慎解读。研究结果常常相互矛盾,且临床相关性存在不确定性。需要更高质量的证据来确定自我护理治疗急性咳嗽的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验