Suppr超能文献

用于普通感冒的皮质类固醇。

Corticosteroids for the common cold.

作者信息

Hayward Gail, Thompson Matthew J, Perera Rafael, Del Mar Chris B, Glasziou Paul P, Heneghan Carl J

机构信息

Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD008116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008116.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The common cold is a frequent illness, which, although benign and self-limiting, results in many consultations to primary care and considerable loss of school or work days. Current symptomatic treatments have limited benefit. Corticosteroids are an effective treatment in other upper respiratory tract infections and their anti-inflammatory effects may also be beneficial in the common cold.

OBJECTIVES

To compare corticosteroids versus usual care for the common cold on clinical response rates in children and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2012, Issue 5 which includes the Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialised Register, the Database of Reviews of Effects (DARE) 2012, Issue 4 and the NHS Health Economics Database 2012, Issue 5; MEDLINE (1948 to May week 2, 2012) and EMBASE (January 2010 to May 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, double-blind, controlled trials comparing corticosteroids to placebo or to standard clinical management.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We were unable to perform meta-analysis and instead analysed results using narrative description of the available evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two trials (253 participants). Both compared intranasal corticosteroids to placebo; no trials studied oral corticosteroids. No benefit of intranasal corticosteroids was demonstrated for duration or severity of symptoms. In one trial of 54 participants, the number of symptomatic days was 10.3 in the placebo group, compared to 10.7 in those using intranasal corticosteroids (P = 0.72). A second trial of 199 participants reported no significant differences in duration of symptoms. There were no differences reported in terms of: adverse events; complications (one case of sinusitis, one case of acute otitis media, both in corticosteroid groups); presence of rhinovirus in nasal aspirates; or treatment for secondary infections. Neither trial reported our primary outcome measure of percentage of participants with resolution at different time points. A lack of comparable outcome measures meant we were unable to combine the data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not support the use of intranasal corticosteroids for symptomatic relief from the common cold. However, there were only two trials and limited statistical power. Further large randomised placebo-controlled trials in adults and children are required to answer this question.

摘要

背景

普通感冒是一种常见疾病,尽管它是良性且自限性的,但仍导致许多患者到初级保健机构就诊,并造成大量的缺课或旷工。目前的对症治疗效果有限。皮质类固醇在其他上呼吸道感染中是一种有效的治疗方法,其抗炎作用可能对普通感冒也有益处。

目的

比较皮质类固醇与普通治疗方法对儿童和成人普通感冒临床反应率的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了2012年第5期的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL),其中包括急性呼吸道感染(ARI)组的专业注册库、2012年第4期的疗效评价数据库(DARE)以及2012年第5期的英国国家医疗服务体系健康经济学数据库;检索了MEDLINE(1948年至2012年5月第2周)和EMBASE(2010年1月至2012年5月)。

选择标准

比较皮质类固醇与安慰剂或标准临床管理的随机、双盲、对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立提取数据并评估试验质量。我们无法进行荟萃分析,而是使用现有证据的叙述性描述来分析结果。

主要结果

我们纳入了两项试验(253名参与者)。两项试验均比较了鼻用皮质类固醇与安慰剂;没有试验研究口服皮质类固醇。鼻用皮质类固醇在症状持续时间或严重程度方面未显示出益处。在一项有54名参与者的试验中,安慰剂组的症状天数为10.3天,而使用鼻用皮质类固醇的组为10.7天(P = 0.72)。另一项有199名参与者的试验报告症状持续时间无显著差异。在以下方面未报告差异:不良事件;并发症(皮质类固醇组各有1例鼻窦炎、1例急性中耳炎);鼻吸出物中鼻病毒的存在情况;或继发感染的治疗情况。两项试验均未报告我们的主要结局指标,即在不同时间点症状缓解的参与者百分比。缺乏可比的结局指标意味着我们无法合并数据。

作者结论

目前的证据不支持使用鼻用皮质类固醇来缓解普通感冒的症状。然而,仅有两项试验且统计效力有限。需要在成人和儿童中进行进一步的大型随机安慰剂对照试验来回答这个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验