Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, London, UK.
Respirology. 2013 Jan;18(1):108-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02251.x.
Respiratory inductive plethysmography is a non-invasive technique for measuring respiratory function. However, there are challenges associated with using linear methods for calibration of respiratory inductive plethysmography. In this study, we developed two nonlinear models, artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, to estimate respiratory volume based on thoracoabdominal movements, and compared these models with routine linear approaches, including qualitative diagnostic calibration and multiple linear regression.
Recordings of spirometry volume and respiratory inductive plethysmography were obtained for 10 normal subjects and 10 asthmatic patients, during asynchronous breathing for 7 min. The first 5 min of recording were used to develop the models; the remaining data were used for subsequent validation of the results.
The results from the nonlinear models fitted the spirometry volume curve significantly better than those obtained by linear methods, particularly during asynchrony (P < 0.05). On a breath-by-breath analysis, estimates of tidal volume, total cycle time and sigh values using the artificial neural network model were accurate by comparison with qualitative diagnostic calibration. In contrast to the artificial neural network model, there was a significant correlation between values for thoracoabdominal asynchrony and increased error of qualitative diagnostic calibration (P < 0.05).
These results indicate that the nonlinear methods can be adapted to closely simulate variable conditions and used to study the patterns of volume changes during normal and asynchronous breathing.
呼吸感应体积描记法是一种测量呼吸功能的非侵入性技术。然而,使用线性方法对呼吸感应体积描记法进行校准存在挑战。在这项研究中,我们开发了两种非线性模型,人工神经网络和自适应神经模糊推理系统,以基于胸腹部运动估计呼吸量,并将这些模型与常规线性方法进行比较,包括定性诊断校准和多元线性回归。
对 10 名正常受试者和 10 名哮喘患者进行了 7 分钟的异步呼吸的肺量计体积和呼吸感应体积描记法记录。前 5 分钟的记录用于开发模型;其余数据用于随后验证结果。
非线性模型的结果明显优于线性方法拟合肺量计体积曲线,特别是在异步时(P < 0.05)。在逐口气分析中,与定性诊断校准相比,使用人工神经网络模型估计潮气量、总周期时间和叹息值更准确。与人工神经网络模型不同,胸腹部异步与定性诊断校准误差增加之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.05)。
这些结果表明,非线性方法可以适应变化的条件,并用于研究正常和异步呼吸期间体积变化的模式。