Retory Yann, Niedzialkowski Pauline, de Picciotto Carole, Bonay Marcel, Petitjean Michel
U1179 Inserm, End:icap, Laboratoire de Physiologie TITAN, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, UFR des Sciences de la Santé, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0151983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151983. eCollection 2016.
The pneumotachometer is currently the most accepted device to measure tidal breathing, however, it requires the use of a mouthpiece and thus alteration of spontaneous ventilation is implied. Respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP), which includes two belts, one thoracic and one abdominal, is able to determine spontaneous tidal breathing without the use of a facemask or mouthpiece, however, there are a number of as yet unresolved issues. In this study we aimed to describe and validate a new RIP method, relying on a combination of thoracic RIP and nasal pressure signals taking into account that exercise-induced body movements can easily contaminate RIP thoracic signals by generating tissue motion artifacts. A custom-made time domain algorithm that relies on the elimination of low amplitude artifacts was applied to the raw thoracic RIP signal. Determining this tidal ventilation allowed comparisons between the RIP signal and simultaneously-recorded airflow signals from a calibrated pneumotachometer (PT). We assessed 206 comparisons from 30 volunteers who were asked to breathe spontaneously at rest and during walking on the spot. Comparisons between RIP signals processed by our algorithm and PT showed highly significant correlations for tidal volume (Vt), inspiratory (Ti) and expiratory times (Te). Moreover, bias calculated using the Bland and Altman method were reasonably low for Vt and Ti (0.04 L and 0.02 s, respectively), and acceptable for Te (<0.1 s) and the intercept from regression relationships (0.01 L, 0.06 s, 0.17 s respectively). The Ti/Ttot and Vt/Ti ratios obtained with the two methods were also statistically correlated. We conclude that our methodology (filtering by our algorithm and calibrating with our calibration procedure) for thoracic RIP renders this technique sufficiently accurate to evaluate tidal ventilation variation at rest and during mild to moderate physical activity.
目前,呼吸流速计是测量潮式呼吸最常用的设备,然而,它需要使用口器,这意味着会改变自主通气。呼吸感应体积描记法(RIP)包括两条带子,一条胸部的和一条腹部的,能够在不使用面罩或口器的情况下测定自主潮式呼吸,然而,仍有一些未解决的问题。在本研究中,我们旨在描述和验证一种新的RIP方法,该方法结合了胸部RIP和鼻压力信号,同时考虑到运动引起的身体运动很容易通过产生组织运动伪影来干扰RIP胸部信号。一种基于消除低振幅伪影的定制时域算法被应用于原始的胸部RIP信号。确定这种潮气量通气使得能够比较RIP信号和来自校准呼吸流速计(PT)的同时记录的气流信号。我们评估了30名志愿者在静息和原地行走时自主呼吸的206次比较。我们算法处理的RIP信号与PT之间的比较显示,潮气量(Vt)、吸气时间(Ti)和呼气时间(Te)具有高度显著的相关性。此外,使用Bland和Altman方法计算的偏差对于Vt和Ti来说相当低(分别为0.04 L和0.02 s),对于Te(<0.1 s)和回归关系的截距(分别为0.01 L、0.06 s、0.17 s)是可接受的。两种方法获得的Ti/Ttot和Vt/Ti比值也具有统计学相关性。我们得出结论,我们用于胸部RIP的方法(通过我们的算法进行滤波并通过我们的校准程序进行校准)使该技术足够准确,能够评估静息和轻度至中度体力活动期间的潮气量通气变化。