Kochhar Gulsheen Kaur, Srivastava Nikhil, Pandit I K, Gugnani Neeraj, Gupta Monika
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, DAV Dental College, Yamunanagr, Haryana, India.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Fall;36(1):5-9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.1.u2421l4j68847215.
To compare the efficacy of caries removal, time taken and to evaluate the pain threshold experienced by the patient during various caries removal methods.
Eighty patients between the age groups of 5-9 years were selected and caries removal was done by hand instruments, airotor, carisolv and papacarie. The efficacy, time taken and the pain threshold was evaluated during the caries removal by Ericson D et al scale, visual analogue scale respectively.
Highly significant relation (< 0.05) was observed when intergroup comparison was made using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
It was concluded that chemomechanical removal of caries with Papacarie and Carisolv were found to be effective measures of caries removal and could be considered as viable alternatives to painful procedures like Airotor in management of dental caries especially in children.
比较不同龋齿去除方法的去龋效果、所需时间,并评估患者在各种龋齿去除方法过程中所经历的疼痛阈值。
选取80名年龄在5至9岁之间的患者,分别使用手工器械、气动牙钻、化学去腐剂和派帕卡瑞进行龋齿去除。通过埃里克森D等人的量表和视觉模拟量表分别评估去龋效果、所需时间和疼痛阈值。
采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行组间比较时,观察到高度显著的关系(<0.05)。
得出的结论是,发现使用派帕卡瑞和化学去腐剂进行化学机械性龋齿去除是有效的去龋措施,在龋齿治疗中,尤其是儿童龋齿治疗中,可被视为气动牙钻等痛苦操作的可行替代方法。