Suppr超能文献

乳牙不同龋病去除技术的评估:一项对比临床研究。

An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study.

作者信息

Kochhar Gulsheen Kaur, Srivastava Nikhil, Pandit I K, Gugnani Neeraj, Gupta Monika

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, DAV Dental College, Yamunanagr, Haryana, India.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Fall;36(1):5-9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.1.u2421l4j68847215.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of caries removal, time taken and to evaluate the pain threshold experienced by the patient during various caries removal methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty patients between the age groups of 5-9 years were selected and caries removal was done by hand instruments, airotor, carisolv and papacarie. The efficacy, time taken and the pain threshold was evaluated during the caries removal by Ericson D et al scale, visual analogue scale respectively.

RESULTS

Highly significant relation (< 0.05) was observed when intergroup comparison was made using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that chemomechanical removal of caries with Papacarie and Carisolv were found to be effective measures of caries removal and could be considered as viable alternatives to painful procedures like Airotor in management of dental caries especially in children.

摘要

目的

比较不同龋齿去除方法的去龋效果、所需时间,并评估患者在各种龋齿去除方法过程中所经历的疼痛阈值。

研究设计

选取80名年龄在5至9岁之间的患者,分别使用手工器械、气动牙钻、化学去腐剂和派帕卡瑞进行龋齿去除。通过埃里克森D等人的量表和视觉模拟量表分别评估去龋效果、所需时间和疼痛阈值。

结果

采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行组间比较时,观察到高度显著的关系(<0.05)。

结论

得出的结论是,发现使用派帕卡瑞和化学去腐剂进行化学机械性龋齿去除是有效的去龋措施,在龋齿治疗中,尤其是儿童龋齿治疗中,可被视为气动牙钻等痛苦操作的可行替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验