• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依那西普和阿达木单抗治疗方案在商业健康计划中招募的银屑病关节炎患者。

Etanercept and adalimumab treatment patterns in psoriatic arthritis patients enrolled in a commercial health plan.

机构信息

OptumInsight, 12125 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2012 Aug;29(8):691-7. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0039-3. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-012-0039-3
PMID:22903239
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Treatment patterns, including persistence, gaps in therapy, switching, and discontinuation, were examined in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who received the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers etanercept or adalimumab.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized administrative claims data from a United States commercial health plan. Adults (age 18-64 years) with PsA who started therapy with etanercept or adalimumab as index therapy between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008 were included in the analysis. Patients were continuously enrolled in the health plan for at least 6 months before and at least 12 months after the start of index therapy. Initial TNF-blocker dose and rates of therapy persistence (continuous use of index medication without a gap of at least 60 days), therapy gaps, and discontinuation (gap in therapy of at least 60 days) were estimated. Those who discontinued were further classified as: (1) discontinued all biologic therapy, (2) restarted index medication, (3) switched to another biologic therapy, or (4) other.

RESULTS

A total of 346 patients with PsA (202 etanercept, 144 adalimumab) were eligible. Most (90.6% etanercept; 88.9% adalimumab) started index therapy at the labeled dose. Persistence with index therapy for 12 months was observed in 50% of patients on etanercept and 45% of patients on adalimumab (P = 0.37). Patients on etanercept had a longer duration of persistence (434 vs. 353 days; P = 0.02), more pauses of at least 7 days (4.7 vs. 3.5; P = 0.004), and a longer mean pause length (48.6 vs. 29.3 days; P = 0.01) than patients on adalimumab. Of patients who discontinued (24.8% etanercept; 35.1% adalimumab), 46.4% and 41.5% restarted etanercept and adalimumab, respectively; 24.8% and 35.1% discontinued all TNF-blockers; 20.0% and 19.2% switched to another biologic; and 8.8% and 4.3% had other therapy changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of PsA patients were persistent on their index TNF-blocker for 12 months. Pauses in therapy and therapy discontinuation were common, but more than 40% of patients restarted their index TNF-blocker after discontinuation.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估接受肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂依那西普或阿达木单抗治疗的银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者的治疗模式,包括持续性、治疗中断、换药和停药。

方法

本回顾性研究利用了美国商业健康计划的行政索赔数据。纳入 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间开始接受依那西普或阿达木单抗治疗作为索引治疗的年龄在 18-64 岁之间的 PsA 成年患者。患者在索引治疗开始前至少连续 6 个月和开始后至少 12 个月均需连续参加健康计划。估计初始 TNF 抑制剂剂量和治疗持续性(持续使用索引药物,无至少 60 天的间隔)、治疗中断和停药(至少 60 天的治疗间隔)的发生率。停药患者进一步分为:(1)停止所有生物制剂治疗;(2)重新开始索引药物治疗;(3)换用另一种生物制剂;或(4)其他。

结果

共有 346 名 PsA 患者(依那西普 202 例,阿达木单抗 144 例)符合条件。大多数患者(依那西普 90.6%;阿达木单抗 88.9%)开始接受标签剂量的索引治疗。依那西普组 12 个月治疗持续性为 50%,阿达木单抗组为 45%(P=0.37)。依那西普组的持续时间更长(434 天 vs. 353 天;P=0.02),至少 7 天的暂停次数更多(4.7 次 vs. 3.5 次;P=0.004),平均暂停时间更长(48.6 天 vs. 29.3 天;P=0.01)。停止治疗的患者中(依那西普 24.8%,阿达木单抗 35.1%),分别有 46.4%和 41.5%的患者重新开始使用依那西普和阿达木单抗;24.8%和 35.1%的患者停止了所有 TNF 阻滞剂治疗;20.0%和 19.2%的患者换用了另一种生物制剂;8.8%和 4.3%的患者接受了其他治疗。

结论

约一半的 PsA 患者在 12 个月内持续使用其索引 TNF 抑制剂。治疗中断和停药很常见,但超过 40%的停药患者重新开始使用其索引 TNF 抑制剂。

相似文献

1
Etanercept and adalimumab treatment patterns in psoriatic arthritis patients enrolled in a commercial health plan.依那西普和阿达木单抗治疗方案在商业健康计划中招募的银屑病关节炎患者。
Adv Ther. 2012 Aug;29(8):691-7. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0039-3. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
2
Treatment patterns in the first year after initiating tumor necrosis factor blockers in real-world settings.真实环境中起始使用肿瘤坏死因子阻滞剂后的第一年的治疗模式。
Adv Ther. 2012 Aug;29(8):664-74. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0037-5. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
3
Tumor necrosis factor blocker dose escalation among biologic naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients in commercial managed-care plans in the 2 years following therapy initiation.在治疗开始后的 2 年内,在商业管理式医疗计划中,生物制剂初治的类风湿关节炎患者中肿瘤坏死因子阻滞剂的剂量升级。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):635-43. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.667028. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
4
Adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab utilization patterns and drug costs among rheumatoid arthritis patients.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗在类风湿关节炎患者中的使用模式和药物费用。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):332-9. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.649325. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
5
National and regional dose escalation and cost of tumor necrosis factor blocker therapy in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients in US health plans.美国健康计划中生物制剂初治类风湿关节炎患者肿瘤坏死因子阻滞剂治疗的全国和地区剂量升级及费用。
J Med Econ. 2014 Jan;17(1):1-10. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.856314. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
6
Differences in annual medication costs and rates of dosage increase between tumor necrosis factor-antagonist therapies for rheumatoid arthritis in a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中,类风湿关节炎肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂疗法的年度用药成本及剂量增加率的差异。
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):825-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.002.
7
Cost per treated patient for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab across adult indications: a claims analysis.依那西普、阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗治疗各类成年适应证的患者每人成本:一项理赔分析。
Adv Ther. 2012 Mar;29(3):234-48. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0007-y. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
8
Disability outcomes and dose escalation with etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a US-based retrospective comparative effectiveness study.类风湿关节炎患者使用依那西普、阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗的残疾结局和剂量升级:一项基于美国的回顾性比较有效性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Apr;28(4):569-80. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.656844. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
9
Treatment patterns following discontinuation of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in a US managed care sample.美国管理式医疗样本中阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗停药后的治疗模式。
Adv Ther. 2014 Apr;31(4):410-25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0110-3. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
10
Persistence with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: observations from the RADIUS registry.类风湿关节炎患者使用抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗的持续性:来自 RADIUS 注册研究的观察结果。
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1273-81. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101142. Epub 2011 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Real-World On-Label Treatment Persistence in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Guselkumab Versus Subcutaneous Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors.接受古塞库单抗与皮下注射肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗的银屑病关节炎患者的真实世界标签内治疗持续性比较
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Sep;11(3):487-499. doi: 10.1007/s40801-024-00428-z. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States.美国免疫介导疾病患者使用无枸橼酸阿达木单抗和枸橼酸制剂的依从性和持续性差异评估。
Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
3
Treatment Mode Preferences in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Qualitative Multi-Country Study.
银屑病关节炎的治疗模式偏好:一项多国家定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jun 8;14:949-961. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S242336. eCollection 2020.
4
Treating psoriatic arthritis to target: discordance between physicians and patients' assessment, non-adherence, and restricted access to drugs precluded therapy escalation in a real-world cohort.针对银屑病关节炎的治疗:在真实世界队列中,医生和患者评估的不一致、不依从和药物获取受限阻碍了治疗升级。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Mar;38(3):961-968. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4383-9. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Medication adherence and persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review.类风湿关节炎、银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者的药物依从性和持续性:一项系统文献综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Aug 21;12:1483-1503. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S167508. eCollection 2018.
6
A Targeted Literature Review Examining Biologic Therapy Compliance and Persistence in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases to Identify the Associated Unmet Needs, Driving Factors, and Consequences.靶向文献综述研究生物治疗在慢性炎症性疾病中的依从性和持久性,以确定相关的未满足需求、驱动因素和后果。
Adv Ther. 2018 Sep;35(9):1333-1355. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0759-0. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
Switching Between Biological Treatments in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Review of the Evidence.在银屑病关节炎中转换生物治疗:证据回顾。
Drugs R D. 2017 Dec;17(4):509-522. doi: 10.1007/s40268-017-0215-7.
8
The Duality of Economic Issues With Medication Non-adherence in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis.炎症性关节炎患者药物治疗不依从性中的经济问题二元性
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 Sep 18;19(10):66. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0691-3.
9
Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.美国成年管理式护理患者中不同适应症每治疗患者生物制剂成本的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2016 Dec;3(4):369-381. doi: 10.1007/s40801-016-0093-2.
10
Biologic therapy adherence, discontinuation, switching, and restarting among patients with psoriasis in the US Medicare population.美国医疗保险人群中银屑病患者的生物治疗依从性、停药、换药及重新开始治疗情况。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jun;74(6):1057-1065.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Mar 4.