Suppr超能文献

美国成年管理式护理患者中不同适应症每治疗患者生物制剂成本的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Gu Tao, Shah Neel, Deshpande Gaurav, Tang Derek H, Eisenberg Debra F

机构信息

HealthCore, Inc., 123 S. Justison Street, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE, 19801-5134, USA.

Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2016 Dec;3(4):369-381. doi: 10.1007/s40801-016-0093-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relative cost of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis, is a key consideration for managed care payers.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to estimate biologic costs and treatment patterns in US managed care patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis.

METHODS

This retrospective study used administrative claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD) for adults with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis who received abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab between 1 July 2009 and 31 January 2013. Biologic costs (based on drug utilization) and treatment patterns (discontinued, restarted after a >45-day gap, switched to another biologic, or persisted without switching or stopping) were analyzed for the first year post-index.

RESULTS

Most of the 24,460 patients received etanercept (48 %), adalimumab (29 %), or infliximab (12 %) as the index biologic. On the index date, 44 % were new to biologic therapy and 56 % were continuing biologic therapy. Biologic cost per treated patient for 1 year was as follows: etanercept $US24,859, adalimumab $US26,537, and infliximab $US26,468. Treatment patterns across indications for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab were as follows: persistent (52, 49, 67 %), restarted (23, 21, 12 %), switched (12, 13, 11 %), and discontinued (14, 18, 10 %).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings from a large health benefits organization in the USA are similar to those of several previous cost analyses assessing different populations, which demonstrates the external validity of the results from the previous studies, both over time and across large populations.

摘要

背景

生物制剂在治疗自身免疫性疾病(包括类风湿性关节炎、银屑病关节炎、银屑病和强直性脊柱炎)方面的相对成本,是管理式医疗支付方的关键考量因素。

目的

我们的目的是估计美国管理式医疗中类风湿性关节炎、银屑病关节炎、银屑病和/或强直性脊柱炎患者的生物制剂成本及治疗模式。

方法

这项回顾性研究使用了HealthCore综合研究数据库(HIRD)的管理索赔数据,研究对象为2009年7月1日至2013年1月31日期间接受阿巴西普、阿达木单抗、赛妥珠单抗、依那西普、戈利木单抗、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗、托珠单抗或乌司奴单抗治疗的类风湿性关节炎、银屑病关节炎、银屑病和/或强直性脊柱炎成人患者。分析了索引后第一年的生物制剂成本(基于药物使用情况)和治疗模式(停药、间隔超过45天后重新开始、换用另一种生物制剂或持续用药未更换或停药)。

结果

24460名患者中,大多数(48%)接受依那西普、29%接受阿达木单抗、12%接受英夫利昔单抗作为索引生物制剂。在索引日期,44%为生物制剂治疗新患者,56%为继续接受生物制剂治疗的患者。每位接受治疗患者1年的生物制剂成本如下:依那西普24859美元,阿达木单抗26537美元,英夫利昔单抗26468美元。依那西普、阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗各适应症的治疗模式如下:持续用药(52%、49%、67%)、重新开始用药(23%、21%、12%)、换用药物(12%、13%、11%)和停药(14%、18%、10%)。

结论

美国一家大型健康福利机构的这些研究结果,与之前几项评估不同人群的成本分析结果相似,这表明了既往研究结果在时间和大量人群中的外部有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1771/5127933/9856c19f4235/40801_2016_93_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验