Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., 6-8, Doshomachi 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Feb;225(3):519-30. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2838-2. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
There is an unmet need in the treatment of schizophrenia for effective medications with fewer adverse effects.
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone, an atypical antipsychotic, for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with once-daily, fixed-dose lurasidone 40 mg (N = 50), lurasidone 120 mg (N = 49), or placebo (N = 50). The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline to day 42 (last observation carried forward) in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale derived (BPRSd) from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).
Mean change in BPRSd was significantly greater in patients receiving lurasidone 40 and 120 mg/day versus placebo (-9.4 and -11.0 versus -3.8; p = 0.018 and 0.004, respectively). Treatment with lurasidone 120 mg/day was superior to placebo across all secondary measures, including PANSS total (p = 0.009), PANSS positive (p = 0.005), PANSS negative (p = 0.011), and PANSS general psychopathology (p = 0.023) subscales and Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S; p = 0.001). Treatment with lurasidone 40 mg/day was superior to placebo on the PANSS positive subscale (p = 0.018) and CGI-S (p = 0.002). The most common adverse events for patients receiving lurasidone were nausea (16.2 versus 4.0 % for placebo) and sedation (16.2 versus 10.0 % for placebo). Minimal changes in weight, cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose levels were observed.
In this study, which was limited by a relatively high discontinuation rate, lurasidone provided effective treatment for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic schizophrenia and had minimal effects on weight and metabolic parameters.
在精神分裂症的治疗中,需要有效的药物来减少不良反应,但目前这方面的需求仍未得到满足。
本研究旨在评估新型抗精神病药鲁拉西酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。
将处于精神分裂症急性发作期的患者随机分为 6 周的双盲治疗,每天一次,固定剂量的鲁拉西酮 40mg(N=50)、鲁拉西酮 120mg(N=49)或安慰剂(N=50)。主要疗效指标是从阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)得出的简明精神病评定量表(BPRSd)从基线到第 42 天(最后一次观测推进)的平均变化。
与安慰剂相比,每天接受鲁拉西酮 40mg 和 120mg 的患者 BPRSd 评分的平均变化显著更大(-9.4 和-11.0 与-3.8;p=0.018 和 0.004)。每天接受 120mg 鲁拉西酮治疗的患者在所有次要指标上均优于安慰剂,包括 PANSS 总分(p=0.009)、PANSS 阳性(p=0.005)、PANSS 阴性(p=0.011)和 PANSS 一般精神病理学(p=0.023)子量表以及临床总体印象严重度(CGI-S;p=0.001)。鲁拉西酮 40mg 组的 PANSS 阳性子量表(p=0.018)和 CGI-S(p=0.002)评分优于安慰剂组。接受鲁拉西酮治疗的患者最常见的不良反应是恶心(16.2%比安慰剂组的 4.0%)和镇静(16.2%比安慰剂组的 10.0%)。体重、胆固醇、甘油三酯和血糖水平有微小变化。
在这项研究中,由于较高的停药率,鲁拉西酮为慢性精神分裂症急性发作患者提供了有效的治疗,并且对体重和代谢参数的影响最小。