Taylor Jane, McManus Alexandra, Claire Nicholson
Centre of Excellence for Science, Seafood and Health (CESSH) Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute.
Australas Med J. 2011;4(12):694-9. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.20111134. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
General practitioners (GPs) are considered a trusted and reliable source of health-related information including nutritional advice. Preliminary investigation found that GPs wanted evidence-based nutrition resources that could be used within a 10 minute consultation.
The aim of the study was to identify and critically review current resources available to GPs that promote seafood consumption within a healthy diet, as a preventative or treatment measure for common lifestyle or medical conditions.
English language resources currently available to GPs in 2008 were sourced through multiple avenues including: individual organisations; medical service networks; health information services and internet search engines. Assessment included critical review of: format; appropriateness for target groups; reference to seafood and supporting evidence; credibility; readability; and suitability for use by practitioners in a short consultation.
One hundred and twenty resources were identified. The majority (88.4%, n=106) of identified resource were available Electronically. Just over half (57.5%, n=69) of the resources were targeted at specific audiences. All of the resources made reference to the health benefits of regular consumption of fish (100%, n=120), 22.5% (n=27) made reference to seafood in general and 5% (n=6) made reference to fish oil. Only 15% (n=18) of the identified resources were suitable for use with the general Australian population at or below the recommended reading level of Year Eight. The majority (87.5%, n=105) of the identified resources were associated with credible sources of information about the health benefits of regular consumption of seafood.
This study found that the majority of resources available to GPs were not suitable for use with the general Australian population at the recommended reading level of Year 8 or lower. Whilst it is acknowledged that written health information alone cannot change health behaviours, it can provide accurate information to assist in making changes to behaviours with support from appropriate health care professionals.
全科医生(GPs)被视为包括营养建议在内的健康相关信息的可靠来源。初步调查发现,全科医生需要可在10分钟咨询时间内使用的循证营养资源。
本研究的目的是识别并批判性地审查当前可供全科医生使用的资源,这些资源在健康饮食中促进海鲜消费,作为常见生活方式或医疗状况的预防或治疗措施。
2008年全科医生目前可获取的英文资源通过多种途径获取,包括:个别组织;医疗服务网络;健康信息服务和互联网搜索引擎。评估包括对以下方面的批判性审查:格式;对目标群体的适用性;对海鲜的提及及支持证据;可信度;可读性;以及从业者在简短咨询中使用的适用性。
共识别出120种资源。所识别资源的大多数(88.4%,n = 106)以电子形式提供。略超过一半(57.5%,n = 69)的资源针对特定受众。所有资源都提到了经常食用鱼类的健康益处(100%,n = 120),22.5%(n = 27)一般提及了海鲜,5%(n = 6)提及了鱼油。在识别出的资源中,只有15%(n = 18)适合澳大利亚普通人群在八年级或以下推荐阅读水平使用。所识别资源的大多数(87.5%,n = 105)与关于经常食用海鲜的健康益处的可靠信息来源相关。
本研究发现,大多数可供全科医生使用的资源不适合澳大利亚普通人群在八年级或更低推荐阅读水平使用。虽然仅书面健康信息不能改变健康行为,但它可以提供准确信息,以协助在适当的医疗保健专业人员支持下改变行为。