• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对面向消费者的 My Health Record 在线信息进行内容分析:提高知识和认识水平以促进采用和使用的意义。

A content analysis of the consumer-facing online information about My Health Record: Implications for increasing knowledge and awareness to facilitate uptake and use.

机构信息

1 La Trobe University, Australia.

2 Deakin University, Australia.

出版信息

Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):106-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712200. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1177/1833358317712200
PMID:28589741
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy, low levels of positive belief and privacy and security concerns have been identified as a significant barrier to personal electronic health record uptake and use. An important tool for overcoming these barriers is the consumer-facing information which accompanies the system. My Health Record (MyHR) is the Australian national e-health record system, for which a large suite of online resources exists to facilitate consumer registration and use. This study uses a number of different measures of health resource quality to assess the MyHR online consumer-facing information and identify any gaps or areas for improvement.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the quality and content of the online consumer-facing resources which support the uptake and use of MyHR.

METHOD

Australian information resources aimed at healthcare consumers about the MyHR were included in this study. A comprehensive search using Internet search engines was conducted to locate all online consumer-facing resources about MyHR from both government and non-government sources. Readability (measured by Flesch-Kincaid grade level), year of publication/review, publishing organisation type, presentation style, linked websites, target audience, and themes were identified as important measures of health information quality, and these were recorded and reported on for each resource.

RESULTS

Eighty resources met the inclusion criteria. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 11.8. Most resources were created by Australian government sources ( n = 55), and the most common target audience was the general public ( n = 65). Registration ( n = 51), privacy/security ( n = 49), and benefits of use ( n = 46) were the most common resource themes.

CONCLUSION

The authors identified a number of gaps and areas for improvement in the provision of consumer-facing information about MyHR. Readability is too high for the general Australian population, and there are few translated resources, which means that the information provided does not cater to people with low literacy levels, communication disability, and/or difficulties in understanding written English. The target audiences for resources do not reflect priority groups that were identified during the MyHR development processes. There are also gaps in information provision about how consumers can use MyHR as a tool to meaningfully engage with health professionals and services to support their own person-centred care.

摘要

背景

低健康素养、低正面信念水平以及对隐私和安全的担忧已被确定为个人电子健康记录采用和使用的重大障碍。克服这些障碍的一个重要工具是面向消费者的系统伴随信息。我的健康记录(MyHR)是澳大利亚国家电子健康记录系统,为此存在大量在线资源,以方便消费者注册和使用。本研究使用了多种不同的健康资源质量措施来评估 MyHR 的在线面向消费者的信息,并确定任何差距或改进领域。

目的

分析支持 MyHR 采用和使用的在线面向消费者资源的质量和内容。

方法

本研究纳入了针对医疗保健消费者的澳大利亚 MyHR 在线信息资源。使用互联网搜索引擎进行了全面搜索,以从政府和非政府来源定位所有关于 MyHR 的在线面向消费者资源。可阅读性(用 Flesch-Kincaid 阅读水平衡量)、出版/审查年份、出版组织类型、演示风格、链接网站、目标受众和主题被确定为健康信息质量的重要衡量标准,并记录和报告了每个资源的这些标准。

结果

80 项资源符合纳入标准。平均 Flesch-Kincaid 阅读水平为 11.8。大多数资源由澳大利亚政府来源创建(n = 55),最常见的目标受众是公众(n = 65)。注册(n = 51)、隐私/安全(n = 49)和使用益处(n = 46)是最常见的资源主题。

结论

作者在提供有关 MyHR 的面向消费者信息方面发现了一些差距和改进领域。可阅读性对于澳大利亚普通民众来说太高,并且很少有翻译资源,这意味着提供的信息不能满足低识字水平、沟通障碍和/或难以理解书面英语的人群的需求。资源的目标受众并未反映在 MyHR 开发过程中确定的优先群体。关于消费者如何将 MyHR 用作与卫生专业人员和服务进行有意义互动以支持他们以人为本的护理的工具的信息提供也存在差距。

相似文献

1
A content analysis of the consumer-facing online information about My Health Record: Implications for increasing knowledge and awareness to facilitate uptake and use.对面向消费者的 My Health Record 在线信息进行内容分析:提高知识和认识水平以促进采用和使用的意义。
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):106-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712200. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Assessing the information quality and usability of within a health literacy framework: What's changed since 2016?在健康素养框架内评估 的信息质量和可用性:自 2016 年以来有哪些变化?
Health Inf Manag. 2021 Jan-May;50(1-2):13-25. doi: 10.1177/1833358319864734. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.澳大利亚“我的健康记录”的电子健康素养需求:可用性的启发式评估
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Oct 1;14(Fall):1f. eCollection 2017 Fall.
4
Digital Health Literacy as a Predictor of Awareness, Engagement, and Use of a National Web-Based Personal Health Record: Population-Based Survey Study.数字健康素养作为国家网络个人健康记录的知晓度、参与度和使用度的预测因素:基于人群的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 16;24(9):e35772. doi: 10.2196/35772.
5
Improving meningococcal MenACWY and 4CMenB/meningococcal group B vaccine-related health literacy in patients: Importance of readability of pharmaceutical Patient Leaflets.提高患者中与脑膜炎球菌性A、C、W、Y群及B群脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(4CMenB)相关的健康素养:药品患者说明书可读性的重要性
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):1109-1116. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13405. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.健康素养与互联网:一项关于澳大利亚在线健康信息可读性的研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Aug;39(4):309-14. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12341. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
7
Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.关于肾癌和膀胱癌的网站的准确性与可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):926-944. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1181-z.
8
Advance care planning, culture and religion: an environmental scan of Australian-based online resources.预先护理规划、文化与宗教:对澳大利亚在线资源的环境扫描
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Apr;42(2):152-163. doi: 10.1071/AH16182.
9
Information needs of people with low back pain for an online resource: a qualitative study of consumer views.腰痛患者对在线资源的信息需求:消费者观点的定性研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(13):1085-91. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.829532. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.抽脂手术的在线患者资源:可读性比较分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Mar;76(3):349-54. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000438.

引用本文的文献

1
Service Users' Perspectives on an Integrated Electronic Care Record in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Vignette and Interview Study.服务使用者对精神卫生保健中综合电子病历的看法:定性情景与访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 3;13:e64162. doi: 10.2196/64162.
2
The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.在医疗保健中实施联合数字标识符:快速审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 8;26:e45751. doi: 10.2196/45751.
3
What drives the adoption of online health communities? An empirical study from patient-centric perspective.
促使人们采用在线健康社区的因素是什么?一项基于以患者为中心视角的实证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 23;23(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09469-6.
4
Knowledge of Australia's My Health Record and factors associated with opting out: Results from a national survey of the Australian general population and communities affected by HIV and sexually transmissible infections.澳大利亚“我的健康记录”相关知识及与选择退出相关的因素:对澳大利亚普通人群以及受艾滋病毒和性传播感染影响的社区进行全国性调查的结果
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Mar 1;2(3):e0000200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000200. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Understanding the Current Landscape of Direct-to-Consumer Health Literacy Interventions.了解当前面向消费者的健康素养干预现状。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Mar 15;19(Spring):1e. eCollection 2022 Spring.
6
Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens' perspective: A scoping review.从澳大利亚公民的视角理解数字健康生态系统:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0260058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260058. eCollection 2021.
7
Assessing the information quality and usability of within a health literacy framework: What's changed since 2016?在健康素养框架内评估 的信息质量和可用性:自 2016 年以来有哪些变化?
Health Inf Manag. 2021 Jan-May;50(1-2):13-25. doi: 10.1177/1833358319864734. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Toward Comprehensive Patient-Centric Care by Integrating Digital Health Technology With Direct Clinical Contact in Australia.通过在澳大利亚将数字健康技术与直接临床接触相结合实现以患者为中心的全面护理
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 4;21(6):e12382. doi: 10.2196/12382.
9
'I'd like to think you could trust the government, but I don't really think we can': Australian women's attitudes to and experiences of My Health Record.“我倒是希望能信任政府,但我真的觉得我们做不到”:澳大利亚女性对“我的健康记录”的态度及体验
Digit Health. 2019 Apr 29;5:2055207619847017. doi: 10.1177/2055207619847017. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
10
The Use of Web-Based Technologies in Health Research Participation: Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences.基于网络技术在健康研究参与中的应用:消费者与研究者体验的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 30;20(10):e12094. doi: 10.2196/12094.