Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(1):38-45. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.713882. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
This study sought to complement the archival research designs that have established the empirical foundations of Rorschach aggression scores, including Exner's ( 2003 ) Aggressive Movement (AG) score and Meloy and Gacono's ( 1992 ) Aggressive Content (AgC), Aggressive Past (AgPast), and Aggressive Potential (AgPot) variables. Utilizing a highly controlled laboratory-based aggression paradigm and self-report measures of violence history in a sample of 35 undergraduate males with an average age of 19.38 (SD = 2.11), this study found that only AgC was positively associated with in vivo aggression (r = .40, p = .02). None of the Rorschach measures of aggression were significantly associated with self-reported violence history, although there were several trends approaching significance. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.
本研究旨在补充档案研究设计，这些设计已经确立了罗夏克攻击评分的经验基础，包括 Exner 的（2003）攻击运动（AG）评分以及 Meloy 和 Gacono 的（1992）攻击内容（AgC）、攻击过去（AgPast）和攻击潜力（AgPot）变量。本研究利用高度受控的基于实验室的攻击范式和 35 名平均年龄为 19.38 岁（SD = 2.11）的男性本科生的暴力史自我报告测量，发现只有 AgC 与体内攻击呈正相关（r =.40，p =.02）。罗夏克攻击测量中的任何一项都与自我报告的暴力史没有显著关联，尽管有几个趋势接近显著。讨论了理论和方法学的影响。
