Simonds S K, Kanters H W
Patient Educ Couns. 1990 Apr;15(2):151-67. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(90)90058-s.
This cross-national comparison study of four health professions is based on review and analysis of professional policy documents and explores the way these selected professions integrate and structure patient education as a professional function. Factors that are internal and external to each of these professions are discussed and compared between the two countries. Professional policy documents related to patient education in nursing, pharmacy, dietetics, and physical therapy are examined in light of changes in dominant concepts of care, changing norms of professional organizations, changes in professional preparation, changes in patient roles, changes in the organization of patient care, and the changes in the health care delivery environment. Differences and similarities between the Netherlands and the United States provide an impetus for developing hypotheses on cross-national developments in patient education and ways for several elements to interact and affect acceptance of and implementation of the patient education function by health professions.
这项针对四个健康职业的跨国比较研究基于对专业政策文件的审查与分析，探讨了这些选定职业将患者教育整合并构建为一项专业职能的方式。讨论并比较了这两个国家中每个职业内部和外部的因素。根据护理、药学、营养学和物理治疗等领域与患者教育相关的专业政策文件，审视了护理理念主导概念的变化、专业组织规范的变化、专业培养的变化、患者角色的变化、患者护理组织的变化以及医疗保健服务环境的变化。荷兰和美国之间的差异与相似之处为提出关于患者教育跨国发展的假设以及若干要素相互作用并影响健康职业对患者教育职能的接受和实施方式提供了动力。
