• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务切换范式中线索使用的顺序调制

Sequential modulation of cue use in the task switching paradigm.

作者信息

Wendt Mike, Luna-Rodriguez Aquiles, Reisenauer Renate, Jacobsen Thomas, Dreisbach Gesine

机构信息

Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 10;3:287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00287. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00287
PMID:22908004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3415689/
Abstract

In task switching studies, pre-cuing of the upcoming task improves performance, indicating preparatory activation of the upcoming task-set, and/or inhibition of the previous task-set. To further investigate cue-based task preparation, the authors presented both valid and invalid task cues in a task switching experiment involving three tasks. Consistent with previous findings, a validity effect in terms of higher reaction times on invalidly compared to validly cued tasks was obtained. However, this validity effect was reduced following invalidly cued trials, suggesting dynamic adjustment in terms of decreased cue-based preparation after being misled. Performance was particularly impaired when the current task was the one that was invalidly cued on the preceding trial. This finding may reflect either particular reluctance to prepare or persisting inhibition of the erroneously prepared task-set from the pre-trial.

摘要

在任务切换研究中,对即将到来的任务进行预提示可提高表现,这表明即将到来的任务集被预先激活,和/或之前的任务集受到抑制。为了进一步研究基于提示的任务准备,作者在一个涉及三项任务的任务切换实验中呈现了有效和无效的任务提示。与之前的研究结果一致,在无效提示任务与有效提示任务相比反应时间更长这方面获得了有效性效应。然而,在无效提示试验后这种有效性效应减弱了,这表明在被误导后基于提示的准备减少方面存在动态调整。当当前任务是前一次试验中被无效提示的任务时,表现尤其受到损害。这一发现可能反映了要么特别不愿意进行准备,要么是来自前一次试验的错误准备的任务集持续受到抑制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/3415689/fa944bb425fc/fpsyg-03-00287-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/3415689/b9126a5d7417/fpsyg-03-00287-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/3415689/980a37a45a12/fpsyg-03-00287-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/3415689/fa944bb425fc/fpsyg-03-00287-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/3415689/b9126a5d7417/fpsyg-03-00287-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/3415689/980a37a45a12/fpsyg-03-00287-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db7/3415689/fa944bb425fc/fpsyg-03-00287-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sequential modulation of cue use in the task switching paradigm.任务切换范式中线索使用的顺序调制
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 10;3:287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00287. eCollection 2012.
2
More than Attentional Tuning - Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying Practice Gains and Preparation in Task Switching.超越注意力调整——探究任务切换中练习收益和准备的潜在机制
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00682. eCollection 2017.
3
Responses to cued signals in Parkinson's disease. Distinguishing between disorders of cognition and of activation.帕金森病对提示信号的反应。区分认知障碍和激活障碍。
Brain. 1997 Aug;120 ( Pt 8):1355-75. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.8.1355.
4
The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?提示任务转换中消散的任务重复收益:任务集衰减还是时间独特性?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):455-72. doi: 10.1037/a0020557.
5
ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.ERP 证据表明,在不确定环境中注意力成本选择性下降:对注意隐蔽转向的纯前运动皮层解释提出挑战。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2648-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 May 26.
6
Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task.由有效预测任务转换的完全和部分信息性线索引发的预期重新配置。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Jun;9(2):202-15. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.2.202.
7
Task preparation and neural activation in stimulus-specific brain regions: an fMRI study with the cued task-switching paradigm.特定刺激脑区中的任务准备与神经激活:一项采用线索提示任务切换范式的功能磁共振成像研究
Brain Cogn. 2014 Jun;87:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
8
Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects.研究任务和反应重复对注意线索效应的序列调制的贡献。
Psychol Res. 2019 Sep;83(6):1251-1268. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0950-y. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
9
Disentangling attention from action in the emotional spatial cueing task.在情绪空间线索任务中区分注意力与行动
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(7):1223-41. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.878688. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
10
Task preparation and stimulus-evoked competition.任务准备与刺激诱发竞争。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Feb-Mar;115(2-3):211-34. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.007.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of rewards on (sub-)optimal interleaving.奖励对(子)最优交错的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 18;14(3):e0214027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214027. eCollection 2019.
2
Why Prediction Matters in Multitasking and How Predictability Can Improve It.为什么预测在多任务处理中很重要以及可预测性如何能改善多任务处理。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 22;8:2021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02021. eCollection 2017.
3
More than Attentional Tuning - Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying Practice Gains and Preparation in Task Switching.超越注意力调整——探究任务切换中练习收益和准备的潜在机制

本文引用的文献

1
Control and interference in task switching--a review.任务转换的控制与干扰——综述。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):849-74. doi: 10.1037/a0019842.
2
The role of inhibition in task switching: a review.抑制在任务转换中的作用:综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):1-14. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1.
3
Proactive versus reactive task-set inhibition: evidence from flanker compatibility effects.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):977-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03194131.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00682. eCollection 2017.
4
Anticipation and the control of voluntary action.预期与自主行动的控制。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 14;4:341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00341. eCollection 2013.
4
Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.序列侧翼任务中的注意转换:年龄、位置和时间进程效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):416-27. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm.任务切换范式中认知控制的预备性调整。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):334-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03193853.
6
Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: no evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Dec;30(6):1043-63. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1043.
7
Task preparation and stimulus-evoked competition.任务准备与刺激诱发竞争。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Feb-Mar;115(2-3):211-34. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.007.
8
Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: evidence for reduction of task competition.作为顺序任务集控制手段的逆向抑制:任务竞争减少的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Mar;29(2):289-97. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.289.
9
Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues.任务切换范式中的准备过程:来自概率线索使用的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):468-83. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.468.
10
Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors.在简单认知任务之间的切换:自上而下与自下而上因素的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Dec;27(6):1404-19. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.6.1404.