Periodontol 2000. 2012 Oct;60(1):138-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00406.x.
There is a need to measure efficiency of periodontal treatments. Efficiency questions can be addressed through a variety of economic evaluation techniques: cost minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost utility and cost-benefit analysis. Each of these techniques is outlined in this article, including a detailed discussion of different preference-based outcome (utility) measures. Despite the need, few analyses have been undertaken in periodontology. There are several issues in undertaking cost-effectiveness analyses specific to periodontology and these are examined in detail: outcome measures including patient-based vs. clinical measures of outcome; discounting or taking into account time preference for outcomes and costs; problems of costing, including the perspective taken in an analysis; interpreting the evidence, in particular using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; and global variation in periodontal care delivery, including healthcare systems and the use of hygienists. The need for cost-effectiveness analysis in periodontology is explored further, and the need to involve a health economist in such an evaluation is underlined.
需要衡量牙周治疗的效率。可以通过多种经济评估技术来解决效率问题:成本最小化、成本效益、成本效用和成本效益分析。本文概述了这些技术,包括对不同基于偏好的结果(效用)测量的详细讨论。尽管有这种需求,但在牙周病学中很少进行分析。在进行专门针对牙周病学的成本效益分析时,存在几个问题,本文对此进行了详细研究:包括基于患者的与临床的结果测量在内的结果测量;对结果和成本的时间偏好进行贴现或考虑;成本计算问题,包括分析中采取的角度;解释证据,特别是使用增量成本效益比;以及牙周保健提供方面的全球差异,包括医疗保健系统和使用保健员。进一步探讨了牙周病学中进行成本效益分析的必要性,并强调了在这种评估中需要健康经济学家的参与。