Torrance G W
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Manag Care. 1997 May;3 Suppl:S8-20.
Economic evaluation of health programs consists of the comparative analysis of alternative courses of action in terms of both costs and consequences. The five analytic techniques are cost-consequence analysis, cost-minimization analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-benefit analysis. Although all techniques have the same objective of informing decision making in the health programs, they come from different theoretic backgrounds and relate differently to the discipline of economics. Cost-utility analysis formally incorporates the measured preferences of individuals for the health outcome consequences of the alternative programs. The individuals may be actual patients who are experiencing or have experienced the outcomes, or they may be a representative sample of the community, many of whom may someday face the outcomes. The health outcomes, at the most general level, consist of changes in the quantity and quality of life; that is, changes in mortality and morbidity. Changes in quantity of life are measured with mortality; changes in quality of life are measured with health-related quality-of-life instruments. Utilities represent a particular approach to the measurement of health-related quality of life that is founded on a well specified theory and provides an interval scale metric. Changes in quantity of life, as measured in years, can be combined with changes in quality of life, as measured in utilities, to determine the number of quality-adjusted life years gained by a particular health program. This can be compared with the incremental cost of the program to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Utilities may be measured directly on patients or other respondents by means of techniques such as visual analog scaling, standard gamble, or time trade-off. Utilities may be determined indirectly by means of a preference-weighted multi-attribute health status classification system such as the health utilities index. The health utilities index is actually a complete system for use in studies. It consists of questionnaires in various formats and languages, scoring manuals, and descriptive health status classification systems. The health utilities index is useful in clinical studies and in population health surveys, as well as in cost-utility analyses.
卫生项目的经济评估包括根据成本和后果对备选行动方案进行比较分析。五种分析技术分别是成本-后果分析、成本最小化分析、成本效果分析、成本效用分析和成本效益分析。尽管所有技术的目标都是为卫生项目的决策提供信息,但它们来自不同的理论背景,与经济学学科的关联也有所不同。成本效用分析正式纳入了个体对备选项目健康结果后果的测量偏好。个体可能是正在经历或已经经历过这些结果的实际患者,也可能是社区的代表性样本,其中许多人未来某天可能会面临这些结果。最一般层面上的健康结果包括生活数量和质量的变化;也就是说,死亡率和发病率的变化。生活数量的变化用死亡率来衡量;生活质量的变化用与健康相关的生活质量工具来衡量。效用代表了一种基于明确理论的、用于测量与健康相关生活质量的特定方法,并提供了一个区间尺度度量。以年为单位衡量的生活数量变化,可以与以效用为单位衡量的生活质量变化相结合,以确定特定卫生项目获得的质量调整生命年数。这可以与该项目的增量成本进行比较,以确定每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本。效用可以通过视觉模拟评分法、标准博弈法或时间权衡法等技术直接在患者或其他受访者身上进行测量。效用也可以通过偏好加权多属性健康状况分类系统(如健康效用指数)间接确定。健康效用指数实际上是一个用于研究的完整系统。它由各种格式和语言的问卷、评分手册以及描述性健康状况分类系统组成。健康效用指数在临床研究、人群健康调查以及成本效用分析中都很有用。