Gnerlich Jennifer L, Luka Samuel R, Deshpande Anjali D, Dubray Bernard J, Weir Joshua S, Carpenter Danielle H, Brunt Elizabeth M, Strasberg Steven M, Hawkins William G, Linehan David C
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Arch Surg. 2012 Aug;147(8):753-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1126.
To correlate microscopic margin status with survival and local control in a large cohort of patients from a high-volume pancreatic cancer center.
Retrospective database review. A uniform procedure for margin analysis was used with 4-color inking (neck, portal vein groove, uncinate, and posterior pancreatic margin) by the surgeon in the operating room.
A tertiary care hospital.
We reviewed patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between September 1, 1997, and December 31, 2008, from a prospective, institutional database.
Using Cox regression models, we identified pathologic characteristics associated with local recurrence (LR) after controlling for potential confounding variables. Overall and LR-free survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Of 285 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 97 (34.0%) had 1 or more positive microscopic margins (uncinate, 16.5%; portal vein groove, 8.8%; neck, 7.7%; and posterior, 10.5%). A total of 198 patients (69.5%) recurred, with the first site of failure being LR only in 47 (23.7%), local plus distant recurrence in 42 (21.2%), and distant recurrence only in 109 (55.1%). Patients with LR only were significantly more likely to have lymph node involvement (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.25-5.63) or a positive posterior margin (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.07-8.81). Patients with a positive posterior margin had significantly poorer LR-free survival with (P < .001) or without (P = .01) lymph node involvement.
When systematically assessed, the incidence of positive microscopic margins is high. Positive posterior margins and lymph node involvement were each independently and significantly associated with LR.
在一个来自大型胰腺癌中心的大量患者队列中,将显微镜下切缘状态与生存及局部控制情况进行关联分析。
回顾性数据库分析。采用统一的切缘分析程序,由外科医生在手术室进行四色标记(胰颈、门静脉沟、钩突和胰腺后缘)。
一家三级医疗中心。
我们从一个前瞻性的机构数据库中回顾了1997年9月1日至2008年12月31日期间接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者。
使用Cox回归模型,在控制潜在混杂变量后,确定与局部复发(LR)相关的病理特征。采用Kaplan-Meier法生成总生存曲线和无局部复发生存曲线。
在285例行胰十二指肠切除术的胰腺腺癌患者中,97例(34.0%)有1个或更多显微镜下阳性切缘(钩突,16.5%;门静脉沟,8.8%;胰颈,7.7%;胰腺后缘,10.5%)。共有198例患者(69.5%)复发,首次复发部位仅为局部复发的有47例(23.7%),局部加远处复发的有42例(21.2%),仅远处复发的有109例(55.1%)。仅局部复发的患者更有可能出现淋巴结受累(校正风险比,2.66;95%可信区间,1.25 - 5.63)或胰腺后缘阳性(校正风险比,4.27;95%可信区间,2.07 - 8.81)。无论有无淋巴结受累,胰腺后缘阳性的患者无局部复发生存期均显著较差(有淋巴结受累时P < .001,无淋巴结受累时P = .01)。
当进行系统评估时,显微镜下阳性切缘的发生率较高。胰腺后缘阳性和淋巴结受累均各自独立且显著地与局部复发相关。