Marková Ivana
University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Dec;46(4):457-74. doi: 10.1007/s12124-012-9210-2.
A commonly held point of view defines a discipline as a science if it uses inductive and/or deductive methods in studying phenomena in question, because these methods, it is believed, will enable generalization of findings. Both history and theory of social representations study unique phenomena and therefore, for these disciplines, induction and deduction are unsuitable methods of exploration. History and theory of social representations treat a historical event and a social psychological phenomenon, respectively, as dynamic, systemic and one of its kind. Using relational epistemologies, these disciplines produce context-dependent and context-specific knowledge. Whilst similarities among historical, as well as among social psychological occurrences do exist, they do not yield themselves to inductive generalization. Studies of unique cases require different kinds of generalization; rather than generalising to populations, they pose questions about generalizability, or transferability, with respect to theories of other historical events or social psychological phenomena.
一种普遍的观点认为,如果一门学科在研究相关现象时使用归纳法和/或演绎法,那么它就是一门科学,因为人们相信这些方法能够使研究结果得到推广。社会表征的历史和理论都研究独特的现象,因此,对于这些学科来说,归纳法和演绎法是不合适的探索方法。社会表征的历史和理论分别将一个历史事件和一种社会心理现象视为动态的、系统的且独一无二的。运用关系认识论,这些学科产生依赖于情境且特定于情境的知识。虽然历史事件之间以及社会心理事件之间确实存在相似之处,但它们并不适合进行归纳概括。对独特案例的研究需要不同类型的推广;它们不是推广到总体,而是针对其他历史事件或社会心理现象的理论提出关于可推广性或可转移性的问题。