Suppr超能文献

忽略性失读症中的错误类型和错误位置:忽略症患者与健康对照的对比分析。

Error types and error positions in neglect dyslexia: comparative analyses in neglect patients and healthy controls.

机构信息

Clinical Linguistics, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Clinical Neuropsychology Unit and University Ambulance, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2012 Oct;50(12):2764-2772. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

Abstract

Unilateral spatial neglect frequently involves a lateralised reading disorder, neglect dyslexia (ND). Reading of single words in ND is characterised by left-sided omissions and substitutions of letters. However, it is unclear whether the distribution of error types and positions within a word shows a unique pattern of ND when directly compared to healthy controls. This question has been difficult to answer so far, given the usually low number of reading errors in healthy controls. Therefore, the present study compared single word reading of 18 patients with left-sided neglect, due to right-hemisphere stroke, and 11 age-matched healthy controls, and adjusted individual task difficulty (by varying stimulus presentation times in participants) in order to reach approximately equal error rates between neglect patients and controls. Results showed that, while both omission and substitution errors were frequently produced in neglect patients and controls, only omissions appeared neglect-specific when task difficulty was adapted between groups. Analyses of individual letter positions within words revealed that the spatial distribution of reading errors in the neglect dyslexic patients followed an almost linear increase from the end to the beginning of the word (right-to-left-gradient). Both, the gradient in error positions and the predominance of omission errors presented a neglect-specific pattern. Consistent with current models of visual word processing, these findings suggest that ND reflects sublexical, visuospatial attentional mechanisms in letter string encoding.

摘要

单侧空间忽略症常伴有侧化阅读障碍,即忽略性失读症(ND)。ND 患者阅读单个单词时,会出现左侧字母遗漏和替代。然而,目前尚不清楚与健康对照组直接比较时,单词内错误类型和位置的分布是否表现出 ND 的独特模式。由于健康对照组的阅读错误通常较少,因此到目前为止,这个问题还难以回答。因此,本研究比较了 18 名因右脑卒中而出现左侧忽略的患者和 11 名年龄匹配的健康对照组的单个单词阅读情况,并调整了个体任务难度(通过改变参与者的刺激呈现时间),以达到忽略患者和对照组之间大致相等的错误率。结果表明,虽然忽略症患者和对照组都经常产生遗漏和替代错误,但只有遗漏错误在组间任务难度适应时表现出忽略特异性。对单词内个别字母位置的分析表明,忽略性失读症患者的阅读错误在空间上的分布几乎呈线性增加,从单词末尾到开头(从右到左梯度)。错误位置的梯度和遗漏错误的优势都表现出忽略特异性模式。这些发现与当前的视觉单词处理模型一致,表明 ND 反映了在字母串编码中次词汇、视觉空间注意力机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验