• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在原子力显微镜中对非均匀表面的力曲线进行平均。

On averaging force curves over heterogeneous surfaces in atomic force microscopy.

机构信息

Department of Physics, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.

出版信息

Ultramicroscopy. 2012 Oct;121:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.06.014
PMID:22917859
Abstract

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) can be used to study mechanics at the nanoscale. Biological surfaces and nanocomposites have typically heterogeneous surfaces, both mechanically and chemically. When studying such surfaces with AFM, one needs to collect a large amount of data to make statistically sound conclusions. It is time- and resource-consuming to process each force curve separately. The analysis of an averaged raw force data is a simple and time saving option, which also averages out the noise and measurement artifacts of the force curves being analyzed. Moreover, some biomedical applications require just an average number per biological cell. Here we investigate such averaging, study the possible artifacts due to the averaging, and demonstrate how to minimize or even to avoid them. We analyze two ways of doing the averaging: over the force data for each particular distance (method 1, the most commonly used way), and over the distances for each particular force (method 2). We derive the errors of the methods in finding to the true average rigidity modulus. We show that both methods are accurate (the error is <2%) when the heterogeneity of the surface rigidity is small (<50%). When the heterogeneity is large (>100×), method 2 underestimates the average rigidity modulus by a factor of 2, whereas the error of method 1 is only 15%. However, when analyzing the different surface chemistry, which reveals itself in the changing long-range forces, the accuracy of the methods behave oppositely: method 1 can produce a noticeable averaging artifact in the deriving of the long-range forces; whereas method 2 can be successfully used to derive the averaged long-range force parameters without artifacts. We exemplify our conclusions by the study of human cervical cancer and normal epithelial cells, which demonstrate different degrees of heterogeneity.

摘要

原子力显微镜(AFM)可用于研究纳米尺度的力学。生物表面和纳米复合材料通常具有机械和化学上不均匀的表面。当使用 AFM 研究此类表面时,需要收集大量数据才能得出统计学上合理的结论。分别处理每个力曲线既耗时又耗资源。对原始力数据进行平均分析是一种简单且节省时间的选择,它还可以平均分析的力曲线中的噪声和测量伪影。此外,一些生物医学应用只需要每个生物细胞的平均数量。在这里,我们研究了这种平均化,研究了由于平均化而产生的可能伪影,并演示了如何最小化甚至避免这些伪影。我们分析了两种进行平均化的方法:一种是对每个特定距离的力数据进行平均(方法 1,最常用的方法),另一种是对每个特定力的距离进行平均(方法 2)。我们推导出了这两种方法在寻找真实平均刚性模量时的误差。我们表明,当表面刚性的不均匀性较小时(<50%),这两种方法都是准确的(误差<2%)。当不均匀性较大(>100×)时,方法 2 会低估平均刚性模量的 2 倍,而方法 1 的误差仅为 15%。然而,当分析不同的表面化学性质时,表面化学性质会在变化的长程力中表现出来,这两种方法的准确性表现出相反的趋势:方法 1 会在推导长程力时产生明显的平均化伪影;而方法 2 可以成功地用于推导没有伪影的平均长程力参数。我们用人宫颈癌和正常上皮细胞的研究为例,证明了它们具有不同程度的不均匀性。

相似文献

1
On averaging force curves over heterogeneous surfaces in atomic force microscopy.在原子力显微镜中对非均匀表面的力曲线进行平均。
Ultramicroscopy. 2012 Oct;121:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
2
Nano-mechanical exploration of the surface and sub-surface of hydrated cells of Staphylococcus epidermidis.表皮葡萄球菌水合细胞表面及亚表面的纳米力学探测
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006 Apr-May;89(3-4):373-86. doi: 10.1007/s10482-005-9041-y. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
3
Atomic force microscopy measurement of heterogeneity in bacterial surface hydrophobicity.原子力显微镜测量细菌表面疏水性的异质性。
Langmuir. 2008 May 6;24(9):4944-51. doi: 10.1021/la7035295. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
4
High-resolution noncontact atomic force microscopy.高分辨率非接触式原子力显微镜
Nanotechnology. 2009 Jul 1;20(26):260201. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/26/260201. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
5
Analysis of bacterial adhesion using a gradient force analysis method and colloid probe atomic force microscopy.使用梯度力分析方法和胶体探针原子力显微镜对细菌黏附进行分析。
Langmuir. 2004 Sep 28;20(20):8817-22. doi: 10.1021/la0488203.
6
Atomic force microscopy measurement of the elastic properties of the kidney epithelial cells.原子力显微镜对肾上皮细胞弹性特性的测量。
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005 May 1;285(1):125-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.11.041.
7
Recognizing and avoiding artifacts in atomic force microscopy imaging.识别并避免原子力显微镜成像中的伪像。
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;736:31-43. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-105-5_3.
8
Atomic force microscopy studies on the nanomechanical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.原子力显微镜研究酿酒酵母的纳米力学性质。
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2010 Aug 1;79(1):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
9
Micro-wilhelmy and related liquid property measurements using constant-diameter nanoneedle-tipped atomic force microscope probes.使用恒定直径的纳米针尖端原子力显微镜探针进行微威尔海姆及相关液体性质测量。
Langmuir. 2008 Dec 2;24(23):13753-64. doi: 10.1021/la802820u.
10
A simple atomic force microscopy calibration method for direct measurement of surface energy on nanostructured surfaces covered with molecularly thin liquid films.一种用于直接测量覆盖有分子级薄液膜的纳米结构表面表面能的简单原子力显微镜校准方法。
Rev Sci Instrum. 2009 May;80(5):055109. doi: 10.1063/1.3136908.

引用本文的文献

1
A guide for nanomechanical characterization of soft matter via AFM: From mode selection to data reporting.通过原子力显微镜对软物质进行纳米力学表征的指南:从模式选择到数据报告。
STAR Protoc. 2025 Jun 20;6(2):103809. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2025.103809. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Pericellular Brush and Mechanics of Guinea Pig Fibroblast Cells Studied with AFM.用原子力显微镜研究豚鼠成纤维细胞的细胞周围刷及力学特性
Biophys J. 2016 Jul 12;111(1):236-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.06.005.
3
Computer simulations of the mechanical response of brushes on the surface of cancerous epithelial cells.
癌细胞表面刷状物力学响应的计算机模拟。
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 28;5:13218. doi: 10.1038/srep13218.
4
If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments.如果细胞力学可以用弹性模量来描述:压痕实验中使用的不同模型和探针的研究。
Biophys J. 2014 Aug 5;107(3):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.033.