Suppr超能文献

膝关节骨关节炎临床试验中参与者保留的障碍:系统评价。

Barriers to participant retention in knee osteoarthritis clinical trials: a systematic review.

机构信息

Honam Research Center, Medifarm Hospital, Suncheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Feb;42(4):346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the reasons and rates of attrition in knee osteoarthritis trials through a systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials.

METHODS

Randomized trials were identified by searches conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We then attempted to identify and describe the reasons for attrition and their associated themes. For each theme, we calculated the rate of patients who discontinued a trial from the total number of dropouts in each trial. The rates obtained with different trials were combined using a random effects model. We also performed a random effects meta-regression analysis to identify sources associated with the rates.

RESULTS

Overall, 259 studies consisting of 266 trials and 13,593 patients were included in the analysis. From these, we short-listed 54 attrition reasons and identified 21 key themes. "Ineffectiveness" and "adverse event" were the reasons frequently reported by >5% of the dropouts. On further investigation of the theme ineffectiveness, the attrition rate was associated with delivery routes of treatment, trial duration, flare design, prohibition of usual analgesics, and allowing the use of escape medication. In cases of adverse events, we found that the treatment type and delivery route affected the attrition rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings not only support the importance of the intention-to-treat analysis, but also suggest the possibility of controlling the attrition at the study level.

摘要

目的

通过对随机、安慰剂对照临床试验进行系统回顾,研究膝关节骨关节炎试验中脱落的原因和比例。

方法

通过在 MEDLINE、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中进行检索,确定随机试验。然后,我们试图确定和描述脱落的原因及其相关主题。对于每个主题,我们根据每个试验中退出的总人数计算停止试验的患者比例。使用随机效应模型合并从不同试验获得的比率。我们还进行了随机效应荟萃回归分析,以确定与比率相关的来源。

结果

总共纳入了 259 项研究,其中包括 266 项试验和 13593 名患者。从中,我们列出了 54 个脱落原因,并确定了 21 个关键主题。“无效”和“不良事件”是超过 5%的脱落者经常报告的原因。进一步研究无效这一主题时,脱落率与治疗的给药途径、试验持续时间、发作设计、禁止使用常规镇痛药以及允许使用逃避药物有关。在出现不良事件的情况下,我们发现治疗类型和给药途径会影响脱落率。

结论

我们的研究结果不仅支持意向治疗分析的重要性,还表明有可能在研究水平上控制脱落率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验