Suppr超能文献

在头颈肿瘤学常规随访诊所中发现患者的担忧:一项探索性研究。

Uncovering patients' concerns in routine head and neck oncology follow up clinics: an exploratory study.

作者信息

Ghazali N, Roe B, Lowe D, Rogers S N

机构信息

Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 1AE, UK.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;51(4):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

Abstract

The Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) is a tool that enables patients to highlight issues they wish to discuss, and helps to uncover concerns that might otherwise be missed. Previous PCI studies have involved direct observation of a consultation by one assessor using a coding method based rigidly on items listed on the inventory. This pilot study explores the feasibility of developing a standardised method of scoring which can be used to evaluate it. We prospectively recruited 40 disease-free patients attending 42 routine outpatient consultations after treatment for head and neck cancer. Before the consultation they completed the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire and the PCI. Nineteen consultations were audio-recorded and transcribed, and 2 assessors used a thematic framework to analyse the content of the consultation to find the number and types of concerns, the professionals involved, and the clinical outcomes. The assessors were in agreement about 80% (65/81) of the audio-recordings. The mean number of items of concern highlighted on the PCI before consultation was 5.95, median (IQR) 4(3-8) in contrast to 6.47, median (IQR) 6(4-9) for those discussed; for involvement of professionals it was 0.74, median (IQR) 0(0-1) in contrast to 2.63, median (IQR) 3(1-4), respectively. We identified 4 new themes for the working thematic framework, which provided a dynamic, standardised, and comprehensive approach based on the observation and responses of those studied. This approach gave an insight into the way the PCI mediates consultations, and how patients do not always understand the support that specific professionals can provide. Overall, patients were satisfied with the consultations.

摘要

患者关注清单(PCI)是一种工具,它能让患者突出他们希望讨论的问题,并有助于发现那些可能被遗漏的担忧。以往的PCI研究涉及一名评估者通过严格基于清单上列出的项目的编码方法直接观察会诊情况。这项初步研究探索了开发一种可用于评估PCI的标准化评分方法的可行性。我们前瞻性地招募了40名在接受头颈癌治疗后参加42次常规门诊会诊的无病患者。在会诊前,他们完成了华盛顿大学生活质量问卷和PCI。对19次会诊进行了录音和转录,两名评估者使用主题框架分析会诊内容,以找出担忧的数量和类型、涉及的专业人员以及临床结果。评估者对80%(65/81)的录音达成了一致意见。会诊前在PCI上突出显示的担忧项目平均数为5.95,中位数(四分位间距)为4(3 - 8),而讨论的担忧项目平均数为6.47,中位数(四分位间距)为6(4 - 9);对于专业人员的参与情况,前者为0.74,中位数(四分位间距)为0(0 - 1),后者分别为2.63,中位数(四分位间距)为3(1 - 4)。我们为现行主题框架确定了4个新主题,该框架基于对研究对象的观察和反馈提供了一种动态、标准化且全面的方法。这种方法深入了解了PCI在会诊中的调解方式,以及患者并不总是理解特定专业人员所能提供的支持这一情况。总体而言,患者对会诊感到满意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验