• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大猩猩在物体选择记忆测试中使用逃避反应。

Gorillas' use of the escape response in object choice memory tests.

机构信息

Think Tank at the Smithsonian's National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2013 Jan;16(1):65-84. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0551-5. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-012-0551-5
PMID:22923213
Abstract

The ability to monitor and control one's own cognitive states, metacognition, is crucial for effective learning and problem solving. Although the literature on animal metacognition has grown considerably during last 15 years, there have been few studies examining whether great apes share such introspective abilities with humans. Here, we tested whether four gorillas could meet two criteria of animal metacognition, the increase in escape responses as a function of task difficulty and the chosen-forced performance advantage. During testing, the subjects participated in a series of object choice memory tests in which a preferable reward (two grapes) was placed under one of two or three blue cups. The apes were required to correctly select the baited blue cup in this primary test. Importantly, the subjects also had an escape response (a yellow cup), where they could obtain a secure but smaller reward (one grape) without taking the memory test. Although the gorillas received a relatively small number of trials and thus experienced little training, three gorillas significantly declined the memory tests more often in difficult trials (e.g., when the location of the preferred reward conflicted with side bias) than in easy trials (e.g., when there was no such conflict). Moreover, even when objective cues were eliminated that corresponded to task difficulty, one of the successful gorillas showed evidence suggestive of improved memory performance with the help of escape response by selectively avoiding trials in which he would be likely to err before the memory test actually proceeded. Together, these findings demonstrate that at least some gorillas may be able to make optimal choices on the basis of their own memory trace strength about the location of the preferred reward.

摘要

监控和控制自身认知状态的能力,即元认知,对于有效学习和解决问题至关重要。尽管过去 15 年来关于动物元认知的文献大量增加,但很少有研究探讨类人猿是否与人类具有这种内省能力。在这里,我们测试了四只大猩猩是否符合动物元认知的两个标准,即随着任务难度的增加而增加的逃避反应和选择强制绩效优势。在测试过程中,被试参加了一系列物体选择记忆测试,其中一个较好的奖励(两个葡萄)被放置在两个或三个蓝色杯子之一的下面。猩猩们需要在这个主要测试中正确选择诱饵蓝色杯子。重要的是,被试也有一个逃避反应(一个黄色杯子),他们可以在不进行记忆测试的情况下获得一个安全但较小的奖励(一个葡萄)。尽管大猩猩接受的试验次数相对较少,因此训练经验较少,但三只大猩猩在困难试验(例如,当偏好奖励的位置与偏侧性冲突时)中比在简单试验(例如,当没有这样的冲突时)中更频繁地显著拒绝记忆测试。此外,即使消除了与任务难度相对应的客观线索,一只成功的大猩猩也通过选择性地避免在记忆测试实际进行之前可能出错的试验,表现出了在逃避反应的帮助下改善记忆表现的迹象。总之,这些发现表明,至少一些大猩猩可能能够根据自己对偏好奖励位置的记忆痕迹强度做出最佳选择。

相似文献

1
Gorillas' use of the escape response in object choice memory tests.大猩猩在物体选择记忆测试中使用逃避反应。
Anim Cogn. 2013 Jan;16(1):65-84. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0551-5. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
2
Do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) know when they do not remember?红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)知道自己何时失忆吗?
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):21-42. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0082-7. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
3
Gorillas' (Gorilla gorilla) use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues in an object-choice task.大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla)在物体选择任务中对实验者给出的手部和面部线索的运用。
Anim Cogn. 2009 Mar;12(2):401-4. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0200-1. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
4
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩)在反向奖励 contingency 任务 II 中的表现:向新数量的转移、长期保持以及数量比率的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
5
Apes' use of iconic cues in the object-choice task.猿类在物体选择任务中对标志性线索的运用。
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):118-30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0013-4. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
6
Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old Western lowland gorillas.西部低地大猩猩幼崽和成年大猩猩的相对数量判断与总和能力
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):285-95. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.285.
7
Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的元记忆
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0217-0. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
8
Do apes know that they could be wrong?猩猩知道它们可能会犯错吗?
Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):689-700. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0317-x. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
9
Great apes use weight as a cue to find hidden food.大型猿类使用重量作为线索来寻找隐藏的食物。
Am J Primatol. 2011 Apr;73(4):323-34. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20899. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
10
Great apes select tools on the basis of their rigidity.大猩猩根据工具的硬度来选择工具。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):409-22. doi: 10.1037/a0019296.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty monitoring in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius).欧亚松鸦(冠蓝鸦)的不确定性监测
Anim Cogn. 2025 May 15;28(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01960-3.
2
Metacognition in nonhuman primates: a review of current knowledge.非人类灵长类动物的元认知:当前知识综述
Primates. 2025 Jan;66(1):9-25. doi: 10.1007/s10329-024-01169-x. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
3
Information seeking in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).西部低地大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla gorilla)的信息搜寻行为。
Learn Behav. 2023 Mar;51(1):59-72. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00554-0. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Social cognition and metacognition in great apes: a theory.类人猿的社会认知和元认知:一种理论。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01662-0. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
5
Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).恒河猴(猕猴)中记忆信号与元记忆的分离。
Anim Cogn. 2019 May;22(3):331-341. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01246-5. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.黑猩猩通过使用工具、进行推理和评估可能的结果,表现出一些有选择地获取信息的迹象。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0193229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193229. eCollection 2018.
7
Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.大鼠知道自己何时产生记忆:基于气味的延迟样本匹配测试中元认知反应的迁移。
Anim Cogn. 2017 Sep;20(5):891-906. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1109-3. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
8
An assessment of domain-general metacognitive responding in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴领域一般性元认知反应的评估。
Behav Processes. 2017 Feb;135:132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
9
Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates.灵长类动物认知:以注意力、情景记忆、前瞻记忆、自我控制和元认知为例探讨非人类灵长类动物的认知控制
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;7(5):294-316. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1397. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.一只元认知猴子的不当行为。
Behaviour. 2015;152(6):727-756. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003251.