Think Tank at the Smithsonian's National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA.
Anim Cogn. 2013 Jan;16(1):65-84. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0551-5. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
The ability to monitor and control one's own cognitive states, metacognition, is crucial for effective learning and problem solving. Although the literature on animal metacognition has grown considerably during last 15 years, there have been few studies examining whether great apes share such introspective abilities with humans. Here, we tested whether four gorillas could meet two criteria of animal metacognition, the increase in escape responses as a function of task difficulty and the chosen-forced performance advantage. During testing, the subjects participated in a series of object choice memory tests in which a preferable reward (two grapes) was placed under one of two or three blue cups. The apes were required to correctly select the baited blue cup in this primary test. Importantly, the subjects also had an escape response (a yellow cup), where they could obtain a secure but smaller reward (one grape) without taking the memory test. Although the gorillas received a relatively small number of trials and thus experienced little training, three gorillas significantly declined the memory tests more often in difficult trials (e.g., when the location of the preferred reward conflicted with side bias) than in easy trials (e.g., when there was no such conflict). Moreover, even when objective cues were eliminated that corresponded to task difficulty, one of the successful gorillas showed evidence suggestive of improved memory performance with the help of escape response by selectively avoiding trials in which he would be likely to err before the memory test actually proceeded. Together, these findings demonstrate that at least some gorillas may be able to make optimal choices on the basis of their own memory trace strength about the location of the preferred reward.
监控和控制自身认知状态的能力,即元认知,对于有效学习和解决问题至关重要。尽管过去 15 年来关于动物元认知的文献大量增加,但很少有研究探讨类人猿是否与人类具有这种内省能力。在这里,我们测试了四只大猩猩是否符合动物元认知的两个标准,即随着任务难度的增加而增加的逃避反应和选择强制绩效优势。在测试过程中,被试参加了一系列物体选择记忆测试,其中一个较好的奖励(两个葡萄)被放置在两个或三个蓝色杯子之一的下面。猩猩们需要在这个主要测试中正确选择诱饵蓝色杯子。重要的是,被试也有一个逃避反应(一个黄色杯子),他们可以在不进行记忆测试的情况下获得一个安全但较小的奖励(一个葡萄)。尽管大猩猩接受的试验次数相对较少,因此训练经验较少,但三只大猩猩在困难试验(例如,当偏好奖励的位置与偏侧性冲突时)中比在简单试验(例如,当没有这样的冲突时)中更频繁地显著拒绝记忆测试。此外,即使消除了与任务难度相对应的客观线索,一只成功的大猩猩也通过选择性地避免在记忆测试实际进行之前可能出错的试验,表现出了在逃避反应的帮助下改善记忆表现的迹象。总之,这些发现表明,至少一些大猩猩可能能够根据自己对偏好奖励位置的记忆痕迹强度做出最佳选择。