Brown Geraldine
Department of Communication Arts at Central Piedmont Community College and Johnson C. Smith University, Charlotte, NC, USA.
ABNF J. 2012 Summer;23(3):63-9.
University and college faculty members may face inappropriate student behavior in a global classroom. This situation can complicate the maintenance of a positive effective learning environment. Student disruption is seen as disturbing behavior that interferes with the faculty member's academic or administrative ability to conduct class, or the ability of other students to profit from the class instruction. Disruptive behavior may threaten or endanger the physical or psychological health, safety or welfare of others. Various types of disruptive behavior and disrespect that university or college faculty are likely to experience include: grandstanding (use the classroom for themselves by monopolizing class discussion with no regard to relevancy to the discussion); prolonged chattering (small cliques of students who engage in private conversations or passing notes to each other); noisy electric devices (cell phones ringing in class, or students talking or text messaging during class time); leaving and entering class (frequently in the absence of notice to professor of illness or other extenuating circumstances); and disputing the professor's authority or expertise (students may be disappointed or unhappy over a grade and may debunk or devalue the professor's judgment, authority and expertise). This action may be in the form of comments in the class or memos to department chair or dean. Persistent speaking without permission and verbal or physical threats to faculty members or other students are also disruptive mannerisms. Working with a diverse student population can present unique challenges. Multicultural issues related to race, ethnicity, gender, physical, emotional or socioeconomic status and sexual orientation might require increased sensitivity, knowledge and self-exploration.
大学教师可能会在全球化课堂上面临学生的不当行为。这种情况会使维持积极有效的学习环境变得复杂。学生扰乱行为被视为干扰教师进行课堂教学的学术或管理能力,或干扰其他学生从课堂教学中获益的能力的令人不安的行为。扰乱行为可能会威胁或危及他人的身心健康、安全或福祉。大学教师可能会遇到的各种扰乱行为和不尊重行为包括:哗众取宠(为自己利用课堂,垄断课堂讨论而不顾其与讨论的相关性);长时间闲聊(一小群学生进行私下交谈或互相传纸条);嘈杂的电子设备(课堂上手机铃声响起,或学生在上课期间交谈或发短信);随意进出教室(经常在未向教授说明生病或其他情有可原的情况下);以及质疑教授的权威或专业知识(学生可能因成绩而失望或不满,可能会贬低或否定教授的判断、权威和专业知识)。这种行为可能表现为课堂上的评论或给系主任或院长的备忘录。未经允许持续发言以及对教师或其他学生的言语或身体威胁也是扰乱性的行为举止。与多样化的学生群体合作可能会带来独特的挑战。与种族、民族、性别、身体、情感或社会经济地位以及性取向相关的多元文化问题可能需要更高的敏感度、知识和自我探索。