Mishel M H
Image J Nurs Sch. 1990 Winter;22(4):256-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00225.x.
The theory of uncertainty in illness has its strongest support among subjects who are experiencing the acute phase of illness or are in a downward illness trajectory (mishel, 1988a). The theory has not addressed the experience of living with continual, constant uncertainty in either a chronic illness or in an illness with a treatable acute phase and possible eventual recurrence. Since uncertainty characterizes many, most prevalent, long-term illness conditions, there is a need to reconceptualize the theory of uncertainty to include the experience of living with continual uncertainty. A close examination of the theoretical statements and the empirical data reported by Mishel resulted in the identification of areas of the theory that could be expanded and reconceptualized. The reconceptualization effort was primarily fueled by questions about the outcome portion of the uncertainty theory. To provide a contest for the expansion and reconceptualization of uncertainty, applicable parts of the theory are summarized below.
疾病不确定性理论在正经历疾病急性期或处于疾病恶化轨迹的人群中得到了最有力的支持(米舍尔,1988a)。该理论尚未涉及慢性病患者或急性期可治疗且可能最终复发的疾病患者持续面临不确定性的生活体验。由于不确定性是许多最常见的长期疾病状况的特征,因此有必要重新构建不确定性理论,以纳入持续不确定性的生活体验。对米舍尔报告的理论陈述和实证数据进行仔细审查后,确定了该理论中可以扩展和重新构建的领域。重新概念化的努力主要源于对不确定性理论结果部分的质疑。为了为不确定性的扩展和重新概念化提供背景,下面总结了该理论的适用部分。