Institut des Sciences Sociales, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):666-78. doi: 10.1037/a0029632. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
Although longitudinal studies have consistently shown the positive impact of performance-approach goals (i.e., the desire to demonstrate one's abilities and outperform others) on academic success, they might allow some strategic behaviors such as cheating and surface studying, leaving open the question of the sheer impact of performance-approach goals on cognitive performance. We argued that the pressure to outperform others might generate outcome concerns and thus deplete working memory resources available for the activity, thereby hindering cognitive performance. Three studies carried out in a laboratory context confirmed this hypothesis. During a demanding cognitive task, performance-approach goal manipulation hampered performance (Experiment 1) by generating distractive concerns that drew on the limited verbal component of working memory (Experiment 2). Moreover, this interference was shown to be specifically due to the activation of performance-approach goal-related thoughts during the task solving (Experiment 3). Together, the present results highlight the distractive consequence of performance-approach goals on cognitive performance, suggesting that cognitive resource allocation is divided among the storage, processing, and retrieval of task-relevant information and the activation of normative goal-attainment concerns.
虽然纵向研究一致表明表现趋近目标(即展示自己能力并超越他人的愿望)对学业成功有积极影响,但它们可能允许一些策略性行为,如作弊和表面学习,从而使得表现趋近目标对认知表现的纯粹影响仍存在疑问。我们认为,超越他人的压力可能会产生结果担忧,从而耗尽用于活动的工作记忆资源,从而阻碍认知表现。在实验室环境中进行的三项研究证实了这一假设。在一项要求很高的认知任务中,表现趋近目标的操纵通过产生分散注意力的担忧来阻碍表现,这些担忧消耗了工作记忆的有限言语成分(实验 2)。此外,实验 2 表明,这种干扰是由于在解决任务期间激活了与表现趋近目标相关的想法(实验 3)。总之,这些结果强调了表现趋近目标对认知表现的干扰后果,表明认知资源分配在任务相关信息的存储、处理和检索以及规范目标达成的激活之间存在分歧。