Department of Psychology, Hope College, Holland, MI 49422-9000, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):913-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029009.
Luke Galen (2012) offers a timely analysis of associations between religiosity and prosocial and antisocial attitudes and behaviors. After identifying 10 points of agreement, I raise 8 questions for further reflection and research: (1) Is ingroup giving and volunteerism not prosocial? (2) Are religion-related prosocial norms part of the religious factor? (3) Is social support also appropriately considered part of the religious factor? (4) Are self-report data from more and less religious people invalid? (5) How should we disentangle gender and religiosity? (6) How might we resolve "the religious engagement paradox"? (7) Does religion serve an adaptive, evolutionary function? And (8) Might research further explore religiosity, in its varieties, and prosociality?
卢克·加伦(2012 年)对宗教信仰与亲社会和反社会态度及行为之间的关联进行了及时的分析。在确定了 10 点共识之后,我提出了 8 个问题以供进一步思考和研究:(1)群体内的给予和志愿服务不是亲社会行为吗?(2)与宗教相关的亲社会规范是否是宗教因素的一部分?(3)社会支持是否也被恰当地视为宗教因素的一部分?(4)来自宗教信仰程度更高和更低的人的自我报告数据是否无效?(5)我们应该如何厘清性别和宗教信仰之间的关系?(6)我们如何解决“宗教参与悖论”?(7)宗教是否具有适应性、进化功能?以及(8)研究是否可以进一步探索宗教信仰及其多样性与亲社会行为之间的关系?