• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宗教和上帝对同群体和外群体亲社会行为的不同影响。

Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup.

机构信息

1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1471-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499937. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1177/0146167213499937
PMID:23969621
Abstract

Recent studies have found that activating religious cognition by priming techniques can enhance prosocial behavior, arguably because religious concepts carry prosocial associations. But many of these studies have primed multiple concepts simultaneously related to the sacred. We argue here that religion and God are distinct concepts that activate distinct associations. In particular, we examine the effect of God and religion on prosociality toward the ingroup and outgroup. In three studies, we found that religion primes enhanced prosociality toward ingroup members, consistent with ingroup affiliation, whereas, God primes enhanced prosociality toward outgroup member, consistent with concerns of moral impression management. Implications for theory and methodology in religious cognition are discussed.

摘要

最近的研究发现,通过启动技术激活宗教认知可以增强亲社会行为,这可以说是因为宗教概念带有亲社会的联想。但这些研究中的许多研究都同时启动了与神圣相关的多个概念。我们在这里认为,宗教和上帝是不同的概念,它们会激活不同的联想。特别是,我们考察了上帝和宗教对亲社会行为的影响,包括对内群体和外群体的影响。在三项研究中,我们发现宗教启动会增强对内群体成员的亲社会行为,这与群体归属一致;而上帝启动则会增强对外群体成员的亲社会行为,这与道德印象管理的关注一致。讨论了宗教认知的理论和方法学的影响。

相似文献

1
Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup.宗教和上帝对同群体和外群体亲社会行为的不同影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1471-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499937. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
2
A Puzzle Unsolved: Failure to Observe Different Effects of God and Religion Primes on Intergroup Attitudes.一个未解之谜:未能观察到上帝与宗教启动对群体间态度的不同影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 26;11(1):e0147178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147178. eCollection 2016.
3
Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup.宗教启动概念对群体内和群体外亲社会行为的影响。
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;12(4):635-644. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170. eCollection 2016 Nov.
4
God is watching you: priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game.上帝在注视着你:启动上帝概念会增加匿名经济游戏中的亲社会行为。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Sep;18(9):803-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x.
5
Buddhist concepts as implicitly reducing prejudice and increasing prosociality.佛教概念在潜移默化中减少偏见并增强亲社会性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Apr;41(4):513-25. doi: 10.1177/0146167215571094. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination.宗教信仰是否能促进亲社会行为?批判性审视。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):876-906. doi: 10.1037/a0028251.
7
Religious prosociality and morality across cultures: how social enforcement of religion shapes the effects of personal religiosity on prosocial and moral attitudes and behaviors.跨文化背景下的宗教亲社会性与道德:宗教的社会强制如何塑造个人宗教信仰对亲社会及道德态度与行为的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;40(3):315-33. doi: 10.1177/0146167213510951. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
8
Reflections on religious belief and prosociality: Comment on Galen (2012).宗教信仰与亲社会行为的思考:评 Galen(2012)。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):913-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029009.
9
Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality.宗教启动:一项关注亲社会行为的元分析
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;20(1):27-48. doi: 10.1177/1088868314568811. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
10
Is religion not prosocial at all? Comment on Galen (2012).宗教根本就不具有亲社会性吗?评盖伦(2012 年)。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):907-12. doi: 10.1037/a0028927.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived Biological Bases of Sexual Orientation and Sexual Prejudice: The Moderating Role of Gender and Religious Beliefs.性取向和性偏见的感知生物学基础:性别和宗教信仰的调节作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Mar;54(3):1245-1259. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03070-6. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Bible Overclaiming and Intimate Partner Violence.圣经过度主张与亲密伴侣暴力。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jul;39(13-14):3040-3061. doi: 10.1177/08862605231225518. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Does Religious Worldview Benefit Life Satisfaction? Examination of the Incremental Predictive Power, Underlying Mechanism, and Temporal Relationship in Hong Kong and the USA.
宗教世界观有益于生活满意度吗?对香港和美国的增量预测力、潜在机制及时间关系的考察。
J Relig Health. 2024 Aug;63(4):2877-2894. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01934-0. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Thinking about God increases acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making.思考上帝会增加人们在决策中对人工智能的接受度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 15;120(33):e2218961120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2218961120. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
5
Heightened religiosity proactively and reactively responds to the COVID-19 pandemic across the globe: Novel insights from the parasite-stress theory of sociality and the behavioral immune system theory.在全球范围内,宗教虔诚度的提高对新冠疫情做出了主动和被动的反应:来自社会性寄生虫应激理论和行为免疫系统理论的新见解。
Int J Intercult Relat. 2022 Sep;90:38-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
6
Ways of Knowing Compassion: How Do We Come to Know, Understand, and Measure Compassion When We See It?了解同情的方式:当我们看到同情时,我们如何去认识、理解并衡量它?
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 2;11:547241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547241. eCollection 2020.
7
Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies.在 15 个社会中,道德化的神、公正与宗教褊狭。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Mar 13;286(1898):20190202. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0202.
8
The effects of name and religious priming on ratings of a well-known political figure, President Barack Obama.名字和宗教启动对知名政治人物巴拉克·奥巴马总统评分的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0180676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180676. eCollection 2017.
9
Neurocultural evidence that ideal affect match promotes giving.神经文化证据表明理想的情感匹配会促进给予行为。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jul 1;12(7):1083-1096. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx047.
10
Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup.宗教启动概念对群体内和群体外亲社会行为的影响。
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;12(4):635-644. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170. eCollection 2016 Nov.