Suppr超能文献

宗教启动概念对群体内和群体外亲社会行为的影响。

Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup.

作者信息

Batara Jame Bryan L, Franco Pamela S, Quiachon Mequia Angelo M, Sembrero Dianelle Rose M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines.

出版信息

Eur J Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;12(4):635-644. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170. eCollection 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Several studies show that there is a connection between religion and prosociality (e.g., Saroglou, 2013). To investigate whether there is a causal relationship between these two variables, a growing number of scholars employed priming religious concepts and measure its influence on prosocial behavior (e.g., Pichon, Boccato, & Saroglou, 2007). In the recent development of religious priming, Ritter and Preston (2013) argued that different primes (agent prime, spiritual/abstract prime, and institutional prime) may also have varying influence on prosocial behavior specifically helping an ingroup or an outgroup target. With this in mind, a 2 (social categorization of the target of help) by 3 (agent prime, institutional prime, spiritual prime) experiment was conducted to directly investigate this hypothesis. Results suggest that priming religious concepts especially the spiritual prime can increase prosocial behaviors. However, no significant effect was found on the social categorization which implies that Filipino participants elicit prosocial behavior regardless of the social categorization (be it ingroup or outgroup) of the target of help. The present study's findings contribute to further the literature on religious priming and its influence on prosocial behavior.

摘要

多项研究表明宗教与亲社会行为之间存在关联(例如,萨罗格卢,2013年)。为了探究这两个变量之间是否存在因果关系,越来越多的学者采用启动宗教概念并测量其对亲社会行为的影响(例如,皮雄、博卡托和萨罗格卢,2007年)。在宗教启动的最新发展中,里特和普雷斯顿(2013年)认为不同的启动因素(施动者启动因素、精神/抽象启动因素和机构启动因素)可能对亲社会行为也有不同影响,具体而言是对帮助内群体或外群体目标的影响。考虑到这一点,进行了一项2(帮助对象的社会分类)×3(施动者启动因素、机构启动因素、精神启动因素)的实验,以直接探究这一假设。结果表明,启动宗教概念,尤其是精神启动因素,可以增加亲社会行为。然而,在社会分类方面未发现显著影响,这意味着菲律宾参与者无论帮助对象的社会分类(是内群体还是外群体)如何都会引发亲社会行为。本研究的结果有助于进一步丰富关于宗教启动及其对亲社会行为影响的文献。

相似文献

1
Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup.
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;12(4):635-644. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170. eCollection 2016 Nov.
2
Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1471-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499937. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
3
Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;20(1):27-48. doi: 10.1177/1088868314568811. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
4
Understanding the role of the 'self' in the social priming of mimicry.
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060249. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
5
A Puzzle Unsolved: Failure to Observe Different Effects of God and Religion Primes on Intergroup Attitudes.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 26;11(1):e0147178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147178. eCollection 2016.
7
The influence of social preferences and reputational concerns on intergroup prosocial behaviour in gains and losses contexts.
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Dec 23;2(12):150546. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150546. eCollection 2015 Dec.
8
Social Class Priming Effect on Prosociality: Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 27;19(7):3984. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073984.
9
Collective synchrony increases prosociality towards non-performers and outgroup members.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Dec;55(4):722-738. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12165. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
The impact of helping behavior on outgroup infrahumanization.
Span J Psychol. 2012 Nov;15(3):1099-109. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39400.

引用本文的文献

1
Helping Across Boundaries: Collectivism and Hierarchy in the Ultra-Orthodox Context.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 13;15(4):520. doi: 10.3390/bs15040520.
2
Prosocial priming and bystander effect in an online context.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:945630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945630. eCollection 2022.
3
The Good Samaritan Parable Revisited: A Survey During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 13;13:776986. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.776986. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;20(1):27-48. doi: 10.1177/1088868314568811. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
2
Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1471-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499937. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
3
Reflections on religious belief and prosociality: Comment on Galen (2012).
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):913-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029009.
4
Reconstruing intolerance: abstract thinking reduces conservatives' prejudice against nonnormative groups.
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):756-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797611433877. Epub 2012 May 31.
5
Religion priming differentially increases prosocial behavior among variants of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Feb;8(2):209-15. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr089. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
6
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):440-63. doi: 10.1037/a0018963.
7
Beyond beliefs: religions bind individuals into moral communities.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):140-50. doi: 10.1177/1088868309353415.
8
9
Religion and support for suicide attacks.
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):224-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02270.x. Epub 2009 Jan 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验