Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Cell Prolif. 2012 Oct;45(5):438-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2012.00838.x.
This study compared rate of cell proliferation, viability, cell size, expression patterns of genes related to pluripotency and epigenetic modification between canine foetal fibroblasts (cFF) and canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (cAd-MSC).
Proliferation pattern, cell viability as well as cell size at each passage of cFF and cAd-MSC were measured when cultures reached confluence. In addition, real-time PCR was performed to investigate expression of Dnmt1, HDAC1, OCT4, SOX2, BAX, BCL2 genes with reference to β-actin gene expression as an endogenous control in both cell lines.
cFF and cAd-MSC differed in number of generations, but not in doubling times, at all passages. Mean cell size of cAd-MSC was significantly smaller than that of cFF. Cell viability was significantly lower in cFFs and apoptotic level was significantly lower in cAd-MSC compared to passage-matched cFF. In the expression of genes related to pluripotency and epigenetic modification, level of HDAC1 in cAd-MSC was significantly higher than in cFF, but expression of Dnmt1 did not differ between the two groups. OCT4 and SOX2 were significantly more highly expressed in cAd-MSC compared to cFF.
cAd-MSC have higher stem-cell potential than cFF in terms of proliferation patterns, epigenetic modification and pluripotency, thus cAd-MSC could be more appropriate than cFF as donors of nuclei in somatic cell nuclear transfer for transgenesis.
本研究比较了犬胎儿成纤维细胞(cFF)和犬脂肪组织来源间充质干细胞(cAd-MSC)的细胞增殖率、活力、细胞大小、与多能性相关的基因表达模式和表观遗传修饰。
当培养物达到汇合时,测量 cFF 和 cAd-MSC 每个传代的增殖模式、细胞活力以及细胞大小。此外,通过实时 PCR 以β-肌动蛋白基因表达作为内参,研究两种细胞系中 Dnmt1、HDAC1、OCT4、SOX2、BAX、BCL2 基因的表达。
cFF 和 cAd-MSC 在所有传代中,世代数不同,但倍增时间相同。cAd-MSC 的平均细胞大小明显小于 cFF。cFF 的细胞活力明显较低,cAd-MSC 的凋亡水平明显低于传代匹配的 cFF。在与多能性和表观遗传修饰相关的基因表达中,cAd-MSC 中的 HDAC1 水平明显高于 cFF,但两组间 Dnmt1 的表达没有差异。与 cFF 相比,OCT4 和 SOX2 在 cAd-MSC 中的表达明显更高。
就增殖模式、表观遗传修饰和多能性而言,cAd-MSC 比 cFF 具有更高的干细胞潜力,因此,cAd-MSC 可能比 cFF 更适合作为体细胞核移植中转基因的核供体。