Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Council of Research, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
J Gambl Stud. 2013 Dec;29(4):765-74. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9331-z.
The aim of this study was to adapt to the Italian context a very commonly used international instrument to detect problem gambling, the canadian problem gambling index (CPGI), and assess its psychometric properties. Cross-cultural adaptation of CPGI was performed in several steps and the questionnaire was administered as a survey among Italian general population (n = 5,292). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.87 and can be considered to be highly reliable. Construct validity was assessed first by means of a principal component analysis and then by means of confirmatory factor analysis, showing that only one factor, problem gambling, was extracted from the CPGI questionnaire (an eigenvalues of 4,684 with percentage of variance 52 %). As far as convergent validity is concerned, CPGI was compared with Lie/Bet questionnaire, a two-item screening tool for detecting problem gamblers, and with both depression and stress scales. A short form DSM-IV CIDI questionnaire was used for depression and VRS scale, a rating scale, was used for rapid stress evaluation. A strong convergent validity with these instruments was found and these findings are consistent with past research on problem gambling, where another way to confirm the validity is to determine the extent to which it correlates with other qualities or measures known to be directly related to problem gambling. In sum, despite the lack of a direct comparison with a classic gold-standard such as DSM-IV, the Italian version of CPGI exhibits good psychometric properties and can be used among the Italian general population to identify at-risk problem gamblers.
本研究旨在将一种非常常用的国际工具——加拿大赌博问题指数(CPGI)适应意大利的背景,评估其心理测量学特性。CPGI 的跨文化适应分几个步骤进行,问卷以意大利普通人群(n=5292)为调查对象进行。Cronbach's alpha 可靠性系数为 0.87,可以认为是高度可靠的。结构有效性首先通过主成分分析进行评估,然后通过验证性因子分析进行评估,结果表明只有一个因素,即赌博问题,从 CPGI 问卷中提取(特征值为 4.684,方差百分比为 52%)。至于收敛有效性,CPGI 与 Lie/Bet 问卷(一种用于检测赌博问题患者的两项目筛查工具)进行了比较,并与抑郁和压力量表进行了比较。简短的 DSM-IV CIDI 问卷用于评估抑郁,VRS 量表(一种评分量表)用于快速评估压力。与这些工具的强收敛有效性发现,这些结果与过去的赌博问题研究一致,在这些研究中,另一种验证有效性的方法是确定它与其他已知与赌博问题直接相关的质量或措施的相关性程度。总的来说,尽管缺乏与 DSM-IV 等经典黄金标准的直接比较,但 CPGI 的意大利版本具有良好的心理测量学特性,可用于识别意大利普通人群中的高危赌博问题患者。