Suppr超能文献

急性呼吸窘迫综合征:诊断与治疗的进展。

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

机构信息

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):698-710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening form of respiratory failure that affects approximately 200 000 patients each year in the United States, resulting in nearly 75 000 deaths annually. Globally, ARDS accounts for 10% of intensive care unit admissions, representing more than 3 million patients with ARDS annually.

OBJECTIVE

To review advances in diagnosis and treatment of ARDS over the last 5 years.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2012 to 2017 focusing on randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical practice guidelines. Articles were identified for full text review with manual review of bibliographies generating additional references.

FINDINGS

After screening 1662 citations, 31 articles detailing major advances in the diagnosis or treatment of ARDS were selected. The Berlin definition proposed 3 categories of ARDS based on the severity of hypoxemia: mild (200 mm Hg<Pao2/Fio2≤300 mm Hg), moderate (100 mm Hg<Pao2/Fio2≤200 mm Hg), and severe (Pao2/Fio2 ≤100 mm Hg), along with explicit criteria related to timing of the syndrome's onset, origin of edema, and the chest radiograph findings. The Berlin definition has significantly greater predictive validity for mortality than the prior American-European Consensus Conference definition. Clinician interpretation of the origin of edema and chest radiograph criteria may be less reliable in making a diagnosis of ARDS. The cornerstone of management remains mechanical ventilation, with a goal to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Aspirin was not effective in preventing ARDS in patients at high-risk for the syndrome. Adjunctive interventions to further minimize VILI, such as prone positioning in patients with a Pao2/Fio2 ratio less than 150 mm Hg, were associated with a significant mortality benefit whereas others (eg, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal) remain experimental. Pharmacologic therapies such as β2 agonists, statins, and keratinocyte growth factor, which targeted pathophysiologic alterations in ARDS, were not beneficial and demonstrated possible harm. Recent guidelines on mechanical ventilation in ARDS provide evidence-based recommendations related to 6 interventions, including low tidal volume and inspiratory pressure ventilation, prone positioning, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure, lung recruitment maneuvers, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome addressed limitations of the American-European Consensus Conference definition, but poor reliability of some criteria may contribute to underrecognition by clinicians. No pharmacologic treatments aimed at the underlying pathology have been shown to be effective, and management remains supportive with lung-protective mechanical ventilation. Guidelines on mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome can assist clinicians in delivering evidence-based interventions that may lead to improved outcomes.

摘要

重要性

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种危及生命的呼吸衰竭形式,每年在美国影响约 20 万名患者,导致每年近 7.5 万人死亡。在全球范围内,ARDS 占重症监护病房入院人数的 10%,每年有超过 300 万例 ARDS 患者。

目的

回顾过去 5 年 ARDS 的诊断和治疗进展。

证据回顾

我们从 2012 年至 2017 年在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中搜索了随机临床试验、荟萃分析、系统评价和临床实践指南,重点关注 ARDS 的诊断或治疗的主要进展。通过手动审查参考文献生成的其他参考文献,对符合全文审查标准的文章进行了筛选。

发现

在筛选了 1662 条引文后,选择了 31 篇详细介绍 ARDS 诊断或治疗方面重大进展的文章。柏林定义根据低氧血症的严重程度将 ARDS 分为 3 类:轻度(200mmHg<Pao2/Fio2≤300mmHg)、中度(100mmHg<Pao2/Fio2≤200mmHg)和重度(Pao2/Fio2≤100mmHg),并与综合征发作时间、水肿起源和胸部 X 线检查结果有关的明确标准。柏林定义比之前的美国-欧洲共识会议定义对死亡率具有更高的预测有效性。临床医生对水肿起源和胸部 X 线检查标准的解释在做出 ARDS 诊断时可能不太可靠。管理的基石仍然是机械通气,目的是尽量减少呼吸机诱导的肺损伤(VILI)。阿司匹林对高危 ARDS 患者预防 ARDS 无效。进一步减少 VILI 的辅助干预措施,如在 Pao2/Fio2 比值低于 150mmHg 的患者中采用俯卧位,与显著的死亡率获益相关,而其他干预措施(如体外二氧化碳去除)仍处于实验阶段。针对 ARDS 病理生理改变的药物治疗,如β2 激动剂、他汀类药物和角质细胞生长因子,对 ARDS 没有益处,且可能有害。最近关于 ARDS 机械通气的指南提供了 6 项干预措施的循证建议,包括低潮气量和吸气压力通气、俯卧位、高频振荡通气、更高与更低的呼气末正压、肺复张手法和体外膜氧合。

结论和相关性

急性呼吸窘迫综合征的柏林定义解决了美国-欧洲共识会议定义的局限性,但一些标准的可靠性差可能导致临床医生识别不足。尚无针对潜在病理的药物治疗被证明有效,管理仍以保护性机械通气为支持。急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气指南可以帮助临床医生提供循证干预措施,从而改善预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验